A longitudinal examination of the psychometric properties of the English perceived stress scale‐ four (PSS‐4) in mental health counsellors using item response theory

Author:

Cook Ryan M.1ORCID,Wind Stefanie A.2,Fye Heather J.3

Affiliation:

1. Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USA

2. The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa Alabama USA

3. Bowling Green University Bowling Green Kentucky USA

Abstract

AbstractWe examined the longitudinal psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale – 4 items version (PSS‐4) using item response theory with a sample of 361 mental health counsellors. Participants completed the PSS‐4 at three timepoints at six‐month intervals in a one‐year period. There were 290 participants who (80.3%) identified as female, 51 (14.1%) identified as male, eight (2.2%) identified as gender variant/non‐conforming, seven (1.9%) wrote in their own gender identity (e.g., genderqueer, gender expansive), three (0.8%) identified as Transgender male, and two (0.6%) did not respond to the item. The racial and ethnic backgrounds were as follows: White (87.3%), Multiracial (5.5%), Latino or Hispanic or Spanish (2.8%), Black or African American (1.4%), Asian (0.8%), Middle Eastern (0.8%), and five did not respond to the item (1.4%). We found unidimensionality evidence of the PSS‐4 across all three timepoints and response categories were monotonically ordered. We also found that across all timepoints, the average person location was lower than the average item location, suggesting that the PSS‐4 may not be well‐targeted for this sample of mental health counsellors. We observed no significant interactions between timepoints, hours worked per week, and length of employment. Implications of the findings, including a discussion of the utility of the PSS‐4 as a global measure of stress and with mental health counsellors.

Funder

Chi Sigma Iota

Publisher

Wiley

Reference61 articles.

1. American Institute of Stress. (2022).Stress research. Retrieved fromhttps://www.stress.org/stress‐research

2. American Psychological Association. (2023a).2022 covid‐19 practitioner impact survey. Retrieved fromhttps://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/practitioner/2022‐covid‐psychologist‐workload

3. American Psychological Association. (2023b).Stress in America. Retrieved fromhttps://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress

4. Applying the Rasch Model

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3