Femoral tunnel length does not impact outcomes following ACL reconstruction using a single‐bundle quadriceps tendon autograft: A systematic review

Author:

Bracken Tess1ORCID,Veilleux Alexandre1,Khalik Hassaan Abdel2,Johnson Jansen2,de SA Darren2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

2. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo determine whether femoral tunnel length (FTL) affects clinical or functional outcomes following primary Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with single‐bundle quadriceps tendon autograft, both with and without a patellar bone block.MethodsAn electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was carried out via OVID. Data pertaining to study characteristics, patient demographics, surgical techniques, femoral tunnel length, and subjective/objective clinical outcomes was abstracted. Studies were stratified into two groups based on FTL; a short femoral tunnel (S‐FT) group of ≤25 mm, and a long femoral tunnel (L‐FT) group of >25 mm. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between studies, prohibiting meta‐analysis.ResultsSeven studies comprising 368 total patients with a mean age of 30.3 years (range: 23.4–34 years) were included for analysis. The S‐FT group included 126 patients and the L‐FT group 242 patients. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant postoperative improvements across both subjective and objective clinical and functional outcomes. Average complication rates were 11.9% (range: 0%–29%) in the S‐FT group and 4.5% (range: 1%–14%) in the L‐FT group. Ranges of re‐rupture rates were 0%–2% and 0%–3% for the S‐FT and L‐FT groups, respectively (n.s.).ConclusionBoth S‐FT and L‐FT groups demonstrated comparable postoperative outcomes following primary ACLR with single bundle quadriceps tendon autograft. There were slightly superior, although non‐significant, outcomes reported with short femoral tunnel length, however, this may have been confounded by the variation in surgical technique used.Level of evidenceIV.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3