Integrated Physical‐Mental Healthcare Services in Specialist Settings to Improve Outcomes for Older People Living With Mental Health Diagnoses: A Systematic Review

Author:

Beishon Lucy12,Hickey Bethan1,Desai Bhavisha1,Chithiramohan Tamara3,Evley Rachel4,Subramaniam Hari3,Maniatopoulos Gregory5,Rajkumar Anto P.6,Dening Tom6ORCID,Mukateova‐Ladinska Elizabeta37,Robinson Thompson G.12,Tarrant Carolyn4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK

2. NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre Glenfield Hospital Leicester UK

3. The Evington Centre Leicestershire Partnership Trust Leicester UK

4. Department of Health Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK

5. University of Leicester School of Business University of Leicester Leicester UK

6. Institute of Mental Health Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences Academic Unit School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

7. School of Psychology and Visual Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundMany older people are now living with co‐occurring physical and mental health disorders, but these often managed separately. The aim of this systematic review was to explore integrated physical‐mental health care services available internationally for older people living with mental health diagnoses, and whether these result in improved health outcomes.MethodsMedline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus were searched with a predefined search strategy (PROSPERO: CRD42022383824), generating 6210 articles. Studies were included where an integrated physical‐mental health care service model was utilised in a population of older people (aged >60 years) with a mental health diagnosis (including dementia or cognitive impairment) and at least one concomitant physical health condition requiring physical health care input. All studies were assessed for risk of bias (ROB 2.0, ROBINS‐I) and results were synthesised narratively.ResultsNine studies were included across inpatient (n = 6, 1262 patients) and community (n = 3, 466 patients) settings. Studies were rated as low‐moderate risk of bias. These covered joint physical‐mental health wards, liaison services, embedded physicians in mental health wards, and joint multidisciplinary teams. Services with greater integration (e.g., joint wards) had more benefits for patients and carers. There were few benefits to traditional outcomes (e.g., hospital admissions, mortality), but greater care quality, carer satisfaction, and improved mood and engagement were demonstrated.ConclusionsMultidisciplinary integrated care resulted in improvement of a range of health outcomes for older people with combined physical and mental health needs. Larger and more robust studies are needed to explore the development of these service models further, with cost‐effectiveness analyses.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3