Controlling Quality in CME/CPD by Measuring and Illuminating Bias-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Controlling Quality in CME/CPD by Measuring and Illuminating Bias

Published:2011 Issue:2 Volume:31 Page:109-116
ISSN:0894-1912
Container-title:Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Dixon David,Takhar Jatinder,Macnab Jennifer,Eadie Jason,Lockyer Jocelyn,Stenerson Heather,François Jose,Bell Mary,Monette Celine,Campbell Craig,Marlow Bernie

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference6 articles.

1. A risk stratification tool to assess commercial influences on continuing medical education.;Barnes;J Contin Educ Health Prof,2007

2. What constitutes commercial bias compared with the personal opinion of experts?;Cornish;J Contin Health Prof,2006

3. Audience assessment of bias in continuing medical education programs.;Price;J Contin Educ Health Prof,2009

4. Physician preferences and attitudes regarding industry support of CME programs.;Mueller;Am J Med,2007

5. Developing an instrument to measure bias in CME.;Takhar;J Contin Educ Health Prof,2007

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The influence of direct-to-physician promotion towards physicians’ prescription behaviour in Malaysia;International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing;2021-11-01

2. Key factors contributing towards the establishment of an academy for short learning programmes at a university-based school of nursing;International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences;2021

3. Antecedents of Symmetry in Physicians’ Prescription Behavior: Evidence from SEM-based Multivariate Approach;Symmetry;2018-12-05

4. Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians’ attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review;BMJ Open;2017-09

5. Quality Assurance and Maintenance of Competence Assessment Mechanisms in the Professions:;Journal of Medical Regulation;2017-01-01