Estimating the burden of skin diseases using patient‐reported daily time trade‐off as a measure of disease impact and unmet needs

Author:

Andersen Yuki M. F.12ORCID,Zachariae Claus2,Thomsen Simon Francis1,Thyssen Jacob Pontoppidan1ORCID,Egeberg Alexander1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Gentofte Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDermatological diseases may cause significantly impaired quality of life, however patient reported outcomes are often disease specific, and not comparable across diseases.ObjectivesTo examine daily time trade‐off (dTTO), as a measure of disease burden.MethodsAn epidemiological study based on patient data from Danish Skin Cohort (prospective cohort of Danish dermatology patients) was conducted. Data were linked with routinely collected data from Statistics Denmark. We included adults with either alopecia areata (AA), atopic dermatitis (AD), hidradenitis suppurative (HS), psoriasis, or rosacea. All patients with a diagnostic code listed above were invited to participate. The primary outcome was defined as a dTTO of more than 30 minutes daily.ResultsA total of 680, 1605, 611, 1664, and 1698 adults with AA, AD, HS, psoriasis, and rosacea, respectively, were included. In multiple regression models, patients with AA were most likely to have a dTTO of more than 30 minutes, followed by patients with HS, AD, psoriasis and rosacea. A total of 33.7% (AA), 29.3% (HS), 14.6% (AD), 11.1% (psoriasis), and 9.0% (rosacea) of patients were willing to spend two hours or more per day. The dTTO correlated with disease severity and DLQI across disease groups.ConclusionsPatients with AA, followed by HS were willing to spend most time on treatment, possibly reflecting unmet needs in these patient groups. Daily TTO correlated with perceived disease severity in all groups and may be a useful measure of dermatological disease burden.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3