Should Researchers Destroy Audio or Video Recordings?

Author:

Resnik David B.1,Antes Alison2,Mozersky Jessica3

Affiliation:

1. Bioethicist at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and a senior advisor for research integrity in the Office of Intramural Research at the National Institutes of Health

2. Assistant professor of Medicine in the Division of General Medical Sciences in the Department of Internal Medicine at Washington University School of Medicine

3. Assistant professor of medicine at Washington University's Bioethics Research Center and a Faculty Scholar at the Institute for Public Health

Abstract

ABSTRACTIt is a common practice in qualitative research to transcribe audio or video files from interviews or focus groups and then destroy the files at some future time, usually after validating the transcript or concluding the research. We argue that it is time to rethink this practice and that retention of original qualitative data—including audio and video recordings—should be the default stance in most cases.

Funder

Intramural Research Program

Publisher

Wiley

Reference31 articles.

1. “SOP 4301: Review Involving Data from Voice Video Digital or Image Recordings ” University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Office of Human Research Ethics accessed May 9 2023 https://policies.unc.edu/TDClient/2833/Portal/KB/ArticleDet?ID=132261.

2. “Video-Audio Recording Policy ” Florida Tech University accessed May 9 2023 https://www.fit.edu/research/faculty--researchers/compliance/human-subjects-regulation/video-audio-recording-policy/; “Research Administration and Compliance Audio/Video/Digital Recordings of Research Participants ” University of Massachusetts Amherst accessed May 9 2023 https://www.umass.edu/research/guidance/audio-recordings-research-participants; “Disposal of Research Data Data Retention and Destruction ” Vancouver Island University accessed May 9 2023 https://research.viu.ca/research-ethics-board/data-retention-and-destruction.

3. Parrot E. S. “Ethnographic Research ” chap. 10-4 inInstitutional Review Board Management and Function 2nd ed. ed. E. Bankert and R. Amdur (Boston: Jones and Bartlett 2006).

4. Data Management and Security in Qualitative Research

5. Barnhill G. D. andE. A.Barnhill “Data Security in Qualitative Research ” chap. 2 inNursing Research Using Data Analysis ed. M. de Chesney (New York: Springer 2015).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3