Efficacy of Low‐Dose Scopolamine and Palonosetron in Reducing Immediate Post‐Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Nausea and Vomiting: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Abstract

AbstractThis study aimed to assess the incidence of post‐discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) following sedation with nalbuphine and etomidate and to evaluate the prophylactic effects of scopolamine in reducing PDNV. A two‐stage prospective clinical trial was conducted. The first part involved an observational study of 77 subjects to assess the PDNV incidence post‐sedation with nalbuphine, etomidate, and propofol. The second part compared the effectiveness of palonosetron 0.075 mg (P group), scopolamine 0.1 mg (S group), and their combination (PS group) in reducing PDNV. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PDNV within 8 h post‐sedation. Secondary outcomes included PDNV frequency and severity at 8–24, 0–24, and 24–48 h and side effects of medications. The incidence of PDNV within 8 h post‐sedation was 37.66% (29/77). The PS group showed a significantly lower PDNV rate of 2.56% within 8 h, compared to the P group (35.71%, P < .001), S group (19.64%, P < .001), and control group (38.39%, P < .001), respectively. The S group (19.64%) also had a lower rate than the P group (35.71%, P = .007) and the control group (38.39%, P = .002). Subgroup analysis suggested a potential differential effect of palonosetron in reducing vomiting among male patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures. The combination therapy was also associated with fewer cases of mild or no nausea and vomiting. In summary, the incidence of PDNV following sedation with nalbuphine and etomidate was notably high. The combination of scopolamine and palonosetron was more effective in preventing PDNV, with implications for improved post‐sedation care.