Is personality and its association with energetics sex‐specific in yellow‐necked mice Apodemus flavicollis?

Author:

Strijker Beau N.1,Iwińska Karolina23,van der Zalm Bram1,Zub Karol3ORCID,Boratyński Jan S.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences Leeuwarden The Netherlands

2. University of Białystok Doctoral School in Exact and Natural Sciences Białystok Poland

3. Mammal Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences Białowieża Poland

Abstract

AbstractFor the last two decades, behavioral physiologists aimed to explain a plausible covariation between energetics and personality, predicted by the “pace‐of‐life syndrome” (POLS) hypothesis. However, the results of these attempts are mixed with no definitive answer as to which of the two most acknowledged models “performance” or “allocation” predicts covariation between consistent among‐individual variation in metabolism and repeatable behavior (animal personality). The general conclusion is that the association between personality and energetics is rather context‐dependent. Life‐history, behavior, and physiology as well as its plausible covariation can be considered a part of sexual dimorphism. However, up to now, only a few studies demonstrated a sex‐specific correlation between metabolism and personality. Therefore, we tested the relationships between physiological and personality traits in a single population of yellow‐necked mice Apodemus flavicollis in the context of a plausible between‐sexes difference in this covariation. We hypothesized that the performance model will explain proactive behavior in males and the allocation model will apply to females. Behavioral traits were determined using the latency of risk‐taking and the open field tests, whereas the basal metabolic rates (BMR) was measured using indirect calorimetry. We have found a positive correlation between body mass‐adjusted BMR and repeatable proactive behavior in male mice, which can support the performance model. However, the females were rather consistent mainly in avoidance of risk‐taking that did not correlate with BMR, suggesting essential differences in personality between sexes. Most likely, the lack of convincing association between energetics and personality traits at the population level is caused by a different selection acting on the life histories of males and females. This may only result in weak support for the predictions of the POLS hypothesis when assuming that only a single model explaining the link between physiology and behavior operates in males and females. Thus, there is a need to consider the differences between sexes in behavioral studies to evaluate this hypothesis.

Funder

Narodowe Centrum Nauki

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3