Neonatal condition at birth of twins conceived by medically assisted reproductive technology compared to those conceived spontaneously: A retrospective study

Author:

Abu Nofal Mais12,Abd Elgani Suzan3,Zafran Noah34,Garmi Gali34,Romano Shabtai34,Salim Raed1234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Holy Family Hospital Nazareth Israel

2. Azrieli Faculty of Medicine Bar Ilan University Safed Israel

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Emek Medical Center Afula Israel

4. The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Haifa Israel

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo examine neonatal outcomes at birth among twins conceived spontaneously or by medically assisted reproduction (MAR).MethodsA retrospective study was conducted at a single university teaching hospital on data collected between January 1995 and September 2019. Live twin deliveries at more than 24 weeks of pregnancy were included. The study group consisted of women who conceived by MAR and the controls were spontaneously conceived twins. The study group was further divided into two groups: in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ovulation induction (OI) groups. The primary outcomes were umbilical artery pH less than 7.1 and/or Apgar score less than 7 of any twin 5 min after birth.ResultsOverall, 2235 eligible twin gestations were included, corresponding to a total of 4470 live neonates; 1009 (45.1%) conceived by MAR (762 [75.5%] IVF and 247 [24.5%] OI) and 1226 (54.9%) conceived spontaneously. Incidence of the primary outcome was 5.3% and 5.1% in the study and control groups, respectively (P = 0.71). The primary outcome was comparable among the IVF (5%), OI (6.2%), and control (5.1%) groups. The results did not change even after adjusting for demographic and obstetric variables, including mode of delivery, which differed between the groups.ConclusionNeonatal condition of twin pregnancies at birth among MAR subgroups is similar to spontaneously conceived twins.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3