Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double‐layer barbed suture: A prospective comparative study

Author:

Alessandri Franco1,Centurioni Maria Grazia1,Perrone Umberto1,Evangelisti Giulio1,Urso Claudia12,Paratore Marco12,Guida Elisabetta12,Nappini Alice12,Gustavino Claudio1,Ferrero Simone23ORCID,Barra Fabio12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genoa Italy

2. Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI) University of Genoa Genoa Italy

3. Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genoa Italy

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare the ultrasonographic features of uterine scars and clinical symptoms after cesarean delivery (CD) using barbed and conventional smooth sutures.MethodsThis case–control study enrolled women who underwent primary CD at 37 weeks of pregnancy or later. The uterus was closed using either double‐layer unidirectional barbed suture or conventional double‐layer smooth suture. Ultrasound scans of the uterine scar and evaluations of menstrual patterns were performed at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.ResultsIn all, 102 patients underwent uterine closure with barbed suture, while 135 patients underwent smooth suture. At 6 months, patients in the barbed group had a lower incidence of uterine niches (20.2% vs 32.6%) that were also shallower in depth (P < 0.001). Lower incidence of niches was also observed in the barbed group at 12 and 24 months (P = 0.043 and 0.048, respectively). At these two follow‐up times, the smooth group had a higher number of patients reporting postmenstrual spotting (P < 0.05) and more postmenstrual spotting days per month (P < 0.050).ConclusionThe use of double‐layer barbed suture during CD was associated with a lower incidence of scar niches and a more favorable menstrual pattern compared with the use of smooth suture.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3