Whole‐body vibration versus supervised aerobic exercise on hormonal parameters and inflammatory status in women with premenstrual syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo compare the effects of whole‐body vibration (WBV) and aerobic exercise on the hormonal profile and inflammatory status in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS).MethodsA prospective, randomized, pre–post‐test, single‐blind, controlled trial was conducted in 105 women diagnosed with PMS. They were randomized into three equal groups. All women received magnesium and vitamin B complex supplementation once daily. WBV training was added three times per week to the WBV group. The aerobic exercise group added aerobic exercise three times per week, while the control group received no additional intervention. The Premenstrual Syndrome Questionnaire (PMSQ) was used to assess PMS symptoms. Blood analysis was performed to measure hormone assays (estradiol, progesterone, prolactin, and cortisol) and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein at the start and after the end of the treatment program.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between WBV and aerobic exercise according to PMSQ and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (P = 0.99 and P = 0.98, respectively), but there was a statistically significant difference between both groups in cortisol, progesterone, prolactin, and estradiol (P = 0.001), with more favor given to the WBV group.ConclusionWBV and aerobic exercise have positive effects on women with PMS, with more favor given to WBV.