Fear of childbirth and use of labor analgesia: A nationwide register‐based analysis in Finland

Author:

Vaajala Matias1ORCID,Kekki Maiju23,Mattila Ville M.14,Kuitunen Ilari56

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences University of Tampere Tampere Finland

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland

3. Faculty of Medicine and Health Center for Child, Adolescent and Maternal Health Research Tampere Finland

4. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Tampere University Hospital Tampere Tampere Finland

5. Department of Pediatrics Kuopio University Hospital Kuopio Finland

6. Institute of Clinical Medicine and Department of Pediatrics University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo calculate the rates of labor analgesia among women with fear of childbirth (FOC) in multiparous and nulliparous women, because FOC might be associated with higher rates of labor analgesia.MethodsIn this retrospective register‐based cohort study, data from the National Medical Birth Register was used to evaluate the usage of labor analgesia in pregnancies with FOC, when compared with those without. The analgesia methods were stratified into neuraxial analgesia, pudendal, paracervical, nitrous oxide, other medical, other non‐medical, and no analgesia.ResultsA total of 19 285 pregnancies with diagnosed maternal FOC were found during our study period. The control group consisted of 757 997 pregnancies without diagnosed maternal FOC. Nulliparous women with diagnosed FOC had a higher rate of epidural analgesia (70.2% vs 67.1%), spinal analgesia (12.3% vs 7.6%), and pudendal block (17.6% vs 9.6%). Multiparous women with FOC had a notably higher rate for epidural analgesia (47.0% vs 29.0%).ConclusionThe main finding in this study was that women with diagnosed FOC had a higher rate of labor analgesia. The results of this study can be used by midwives, obstetricians, and anesthesiologists to provide optimal pain relief for mothers with FOC.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3