Affiliation:
1. Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute Texas A&M University – Kingsville 700 University Boulevard Kingsville TX 78363 USA
2. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center Florida Field Station 2820 East University Avenue Gainesville FL 32641 USA
3. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services 3901 Mokulele Loop Unit 20 Lihue HI 96766 USA
4. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Hawai'i Field Station 210 Amau'ulu Road Hilo HI 96720 USA
5. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, North Dakota Field Station North Dakota State University 1340 Bolley Drive Fargo ND 58102 USA
Abstract
AbstractOver 40 species of parrots, members of order Psittaciformes, have established nonnative populations globally. Monk parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus) are among the most invasive bird species worldwide. In their introduced range, populations of monk parakeets have caused negative impacts on native species, habitats, economies, and human safety. Lethal population management has been complicated by the intelligence of monk parakeets, as they quickly alter behavior to avoid risks. Further, lethal control programs have been halted due to public controversy, as parakeets are highly charismatic. The contraceptive DiazaCon has been demonstrated to effectively reduce fertility in monk parakeets and other psittacines. In field applications, chemical control agents (e.g., toxicants and contraceptives) must be delivered in a manner that prohibits access by nontarget species. We developed and tested a parakeet‐selective feeder. The feeder allows access by parakeets and limits access by nontarget bird species by lowering a wire exclusion curtain around the feeder, requiring a zygodactyl toe arrangement to access food. We tested the parakeet‐selective feeder in trials with captive and free‐ranging monk parakeets and nontarget species in Florida, USA. Monk parakeets successfully accessed food from the parakeet‐selective feeder throughout the study. The mean number of daily feeder uses by nontarget species decreased from a high of nearly 16 uses per day when the exclusion curtain was not implemented to <1 use per day when implemented. Our findings suggest the parakeet‐selective feeder is a promising tool for delivery of bait treated with chemical control agents to manage monk parakeets and other nonnative parakeet populations, but implementation success will likely vary by target species, location, local faunal diversity, and availability of alternative forage.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献