Future Frontiers: Exploration of practices, challenges, and educational needs of genetic counselors in emerging subspecialties

Author:

Ahimaz Priyanka1ORCID,Ross Meredith2,Foltz Jennah3,Sebastin Monisha4,Naik Ketki2,Kramer Tamar2,Bogyo Kelsie5,Primiano Michelle6

Affiliation:

1. Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics Columbia University New York New York USA

2. Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics Columbia University New York New York USA

3. Genetic Counseling Graduate Program Columbia University New York New York USA

4. Division of Genetics Medicine, Department of Pediatrics Montefiore Medical Center New York New York USA

5. Interdepartmental Genetic Counseling Program, Department of Medicine Columbia University New York New York USA

6. Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Oncology Weill Cornell Medical Center New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractThe augmented use of genomic testing across different medical subspecialties has led to increased involvement of genetic counselors (GCs) in specialized areas of medicine. However, the lack of educational infrastructure required for changing scholastic needs of GCs entering new subspecialties lends to the burden of self‐directed learning and inconsistent knowledge. We conducted a cross‐sectional study surveying GCs with experience in the emerging genetic subspecialties of Immunology, Dermatology, Endocrinology, and Pulmonology (abbreviated as “IDEP”) on current practices, clinical challenges, and educational strategies undertaken while working in these settings. We compared knowledge and confidence in skills related to IDEP patient care between GCs who do (experienced cohort) and do not (control cohort) practice in these settings to assess their comfort with working in subspecialties. Participants were recruited from the National Society of Genetic Counselors membership. A total of 304 GCs (178 experienced and 126 control) completed the survey. Most GCs in the experienced cohort saw IDEP patients by themselves (n = 104; 58.4%) or with a geneticist (n = 97; 54.4%) and almost all (n = 176; 99%) cited GeneReviews as a primary informational source for IDEP genetics but half (n = 91; 51.1%) agreed that a dedicated online course would be the best way to learn about a specific subspecialty. The experienced cohort scored higher on confidence in all skills (p < 0.001, z = 7.32) and knowledge (p < 0.001, z = 5.68) related to IDEP genetics than the control cohort. Previous exposure to IDEP through graduate school coursework and rotations positively correlated with better self‐confidence in skills (p = 0.02, z = −2.19; p < 0.001, z = −5.25) and genetic knowledge (p = 0.03, z = −2.09; p < 0.001, z = −2.81) related to IDEP patient care. Years of experience working as a GC did not correlate with better confidence in skills (p = 0.53) or better IDEP genetic knowledge (p = 0.15). Our findings show that provision of opportunities for increased exposure to subspecialties could help maximize GCs' ability to work in emerging niche fields.

Funder

National Society of Genetic Counselors

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical)

Reference40 articles.

1. Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling. (2013).Standards of Accreditation for Graduate Programs in Genetic Counseling.http://www.gceducation.org/Documents/Standards%20Final%20approved%20Feb%202013.pdf

2. Establishment of Specialized Clinical Cardiovascular Genetics Programs: Recognizing the Need and Meeting Standards: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

3. Points to consider for informed consent for genome/exome sequencing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3