Multidimensional stressors and protective factors shaping physicians' work environments and work‐related well‐being in two large US cities during COVID‐19

Author:

Buchbinder Mara1ORCID,Jenkins Tania2,Staley John3,Berlinger Nancy4,Buchbinder Liza5,Goldberg Lily6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, School of Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

2. Department of Sociology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

3. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering and NC Occupational Safety and Health Education and Research Center, Gillings School of Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

4. The Hastings Center Philipstown New York USA

5. Center for Social Medicine and Humanities and Semel Institute University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA

6. Gillings School of Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionClinician burnout and poor work‐related well‐being reached a critical inflection point during the COVID‐19 pandemic. This article applies a novel conceptual model informed by the Total Worker Health® approach to identify and describe multilevel stressors and protective factors that affected frontline physicians' work environments and work‐related well‐being.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study of hospital‐based physicians from multiple hospital types in Los Angeles and Miami who cared for COVID‐19 patients. Semistructured interviews lasting 60–90 min were conducted over Zoom. Interview transcripts were thematically coded using Dedoose qualitative software.ResultsThe final sample of 66 physicians worked in 20 hospitals. Stressors in the social, political, and economic environment included dealing with the politicization of COVID‐19, including vaccine hesitancy; state and federal governmental COVID‐19 policies and messaging; and shifting CDC guidance. Employment and labor pattern stressors included the national nursing shortage, different policies for paid time off, furloughs, reduced pay, and layoffs. Organizational‐level stressors included institutional policies, staffing constraints and high patient volume (i.e., increased number of cases and longer lengths of stay), and perceived poor leadership. At the individual worker level, stressors included concerns about viral transmission to family, strained personal relationships, and work‐life fit, particularly for those with young children. Respondents identified promising protective factors at multiple levels, including responsive state leadership, job security, concrete opportunities to provide input into institutional policy, strong leadership and communication, and feeling cared for by one's institution.ConclusionFindings support a multi‐level strategy that acknowledges internal organizational and external factors shaping clinicians' work‐related well‐being, consistent with the Total Worker Health® approach.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3