Affiliation:
1. Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, School of Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
2. Department of Sociology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
3. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering and NC Occupational Safety and Health Education and Research Center, Gillings School of Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
4. The Hastings Center Philipstown New York USA
5. Center for Social Medicine and Humanities and Semel Institute University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA
6. Gillings School of Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionClinician burnout and poor work‐related well‐being reached a critical inflection point during the COVID‐19 pandemic. This article applies a novel conceptual model informed by the Total Worker Health® approach to identify and describe multilevel stressors and protective factors that affected frontline physicians' work environments and work‐related well‐being.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study of hospital‐based physicians from multiple hospital types in Los Angeles and Miami who cared for COVID‐19 patients. Semistructured interviews lasting 60–90 min were conducted over Zoom. Interview transcripts were thematically coded using Dedoose qualitative software.ResultsThe final sample of 66 physicians worked in 20 hospitals. Stressors in the social, political, and economic environment included dealing with the politicization of COVID‐19, including vaccine hesitancy; state and federal governmental COVID‐19 policies and messaging; and shifting CDC guidance. Employment and labor pattern stressors included the national nursing shortage, different policies for paid time off, furloughs, reduced pay, and layoffs. Organizational‐level stressors included institutional policies, staffing constraints and high patient volume (i.e., increased number of cases and longer lengths of stay), and perceived poor leadership. At the individual worker level, stressors included concerns about viral transmission to family, strained personal relationships, and work‐life fit, particularly for those with young children. Respondents identified promising protective factors at multiple levels, including responsive state leadership, job security, concrete opportunities to provide input into institutional policy, strong leadership and communication, and feeling cared for by one's institution.ConclusionFindings support a multi‐level strategy that acknowledges internal organizational and external factors shaping clinicians' work‐related well‐being, consistent with the Total Worker Health® approach.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health