Factors and strategies influencing implementation of an intravenous iron intervention for antenatal anaemia: A mixed‐methods systematic review

Author:

Verbunt Ebony1ORCID,Akter Shahinoor2,Manda‐Taylor Lucinda3,Sarker Bidhan4,Ataide Ricardo56,Davidson Eliza5,Pasricha Sant‐Rayn5,Prang Khic‐Houy1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health The University of Melbourne Carlton Victoria Australia

2. Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health The University of Melbourne Carlton Victoria Australia

3. School of Global and Public Health Kamuzu University of Health Sciences Blantyre Malawi

4. Maternal and Child Health Division, icddr,b Dhaka Bangladesh

5. Population Health and Immunity Division Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Parkville Victoria Australia

6. Department of Infectious Diseases, The Peter Doherty Institute University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionAnaemia during pregnancy is a significant global health problem, disproportionately affecting women in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Oral iron is the standard of care; however, challenges exist regarding adherence and coverage. Increasingly, evidence demonstrates the superiority of intravenous (IV) iron over oral iron. Although clinical experience on IV iron for antenatal anaemia is growing, there remains little understanding regarding implementation. Our mixed‐method systematic review aims to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing an IV iron intervention for pregnant women with anaemia and implementation strategies.MethodsFive bibliographic databases and grey literature were searched for studies. Barriers and facilitators were identified and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and then matched to Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies using the CFIR‐ERIC matching tool.ResultsThe search identified six studies. Most studies captured the perspective of healthcare providers, with some studies capturing the perspective of pregnant women. Barriers and facilitators were mapped to the following CFIR constructs: (1) intervention characteristics—cost, complexity, evidence strength and quality, and relative advantage; (2) outer setting—patient needs and resources; (3) inner setting—culture, available resources and access to knowledge and information; (4) characteristics of individuals—knowledge and beliefs about the intervention; (5) process—champions. Matching ERIC strategies included identifying and preparing champions, conducting educational meetings and assessing for readiness and identifying barriers and facilitators.ConclusionOnce tailored to each context, our findings can be used to improve the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of an IV iron programme for pregnant women with anaemia.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3