Systematic reviews and quality assessment of patient‐reported outcome measures for physical function in comparative effectiveness studies regarding acute postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty—Do we need to start all over again?

Author:

Heitkamp H.1ORCID,Heußner D.1ORCID,Rosenberger D. C.1ORCID,Schnabel K.1,Rosenthal D.1,Bigalke S.1,Maeßen T. V.1,Hohenschurz‐Schmidt D.23ORCID,Liedgens H.4,Kaiser U.5,Pogatzki‐Zahn E. M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy University Hospital Münster Münster Germany

2. Pain Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK

3. Research Department University College of Osteopathy London UK

4. Gruenenthal GmbH Aachen Germany

5. Clinic for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Campus Lübeck University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein Lübeck Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectiveRecently, a consensus process specified a core outcome set (COS) of domains to be assessed in each comparative effectiveness research and clinical practice related to acute postoperative pain. Physical function (PF) was one of these domains. The aim of this review was to investigate which patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to assess PF after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in clinical trials and if they fulfil basic requirements for a COS of PROMs based on their psychometric properties.MethodsA systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies based on a search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL was undertaken. PROMs and performance measures were extracted and investigated, including evaluation of psychometric properties of PROMs based on COSMIN recommendations.ResultsFrom initially 2896 identified records, 479 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Only 87 of these trials (18%) assessed PF using PROMs, whereas especially performance outcome measures were used in 470 studies (98%). Application of the ‘COSMIN Risk‐of‐Bias‐Box 1’ to 13 of the 14 identified PROMs resulted in insufficient content validity of the included PROMs regarding the target population based on the inauguration or development articles.ConclusionOur data indicate that a patient‐centred postoperative assessment of PF in pain‐related clinical trials early after TKA is not common, even though patient‐reported assessment is widely recommended. In addition, none of the applied PROMs shows content validity based on their inauguration or development articles for the assessment of postoperative pain‐related PF after TKA.SignificanceA systematic search for patient‐reported outcome measures assessing postoperative, pain‐related physical function after total knee arthroplasty in clinical trials and assessment of their content validity revealed none that fulfilled requirements based on COSMIN recommendations.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3