Excellent accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of discoid meniscus tears: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe discoid meniscus (DM) is distinguished by its thickened, disc‐shaped formation, which extends over the tibial plateau. The likelihood of developing osteoarthritis escalates if a DM tear remains undiagnosed and untreated. While DM tears can be diagnosed through arthroscopy, the high cost, invasive nature and limited availability of this procedure highlight the need for a better diagnostic modality. This study aims to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing DM tears.MethodsA systematic review was conducted to gather articles with at least 10 cases on the comparison of MRI and arthroscopy as the gold standard for DM tear diagnosis. Stata and MetaDisc were used to conduct the statistical analysis. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool.ResultsFive diagnostic performance studies, derived from four original research papers involving 305 patients, were evaluated. Based on the pooled data, the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive limit of detection and negative limit of detection were found to be 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82–0.91) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75–0.90), 32.88 (95% CI, 5.81–186.02), 5.22 (95% CI, 1.71–15.92) and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.09–0.38), respectively. A hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve with an area under the curve of 0.92 was generated.ConclusionThis meta‐analysis demonstrates that MRI has excellent sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing DM tears. Despite its lower accuracy compared to arthroscopy, MRI can be used in symptomatic patients as a viable alternative to arthroscopy due to its inherent advantages.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.