Ultrasound‐based bone tracking using cross‐correlation enables dynamic measurements of knee kinematics during clinical assessments

Author:

Blomquist Matthew B.1ORCID,Roth Joshua D.23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

2. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

3. Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeMeasuring joint kinematics in the clinic is important for diagnosing injuries, tracking healing and guiding treatments; however, current methods are limited by accuracy and/or feasibility of widespread clinical adoption. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate an ultrasound (US)‐based method for measuring knee kinematics during clinical assessments.MethodsWe mimicked four clinical laxity assessments (i.e., anterior, posterior, varus, valgus) on five human cadaver knees using our robotic testing system. We simultaneously collected B‐mode cine loops with an US transducer. We computed the errors in kinematics between those measured using our bone‐tracking algorithm, which cross‐correlated regions of interest across frames of the cine loops, and those measured using optical motion capture with bone pins. Additionally, we conducted studies to determine the effects of loading rate and transducer placement on kinematics measured using our US‐based bone tracking.ResultsPooling the trials at experimental speeds and those downsampled to replicate clinical laxity assessments, the maximum root‐mean‐square errors of knee kinematics using our bone‐tracking algorithm were 2.2 mm and 1.3° for the anterior‐posterior and varus‐valgus laxity assessments, respectively. Repeated laxity assessments proved to have good‐to‐excellent repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] of 0.81–0.99), but ICCs from repositioning the transducer varied more widely, ranging from poor‐to‐good reproducibility (0.19–0.89).ConclusionOur results demonstrate that US is capable of tracking knee kinematics during dynamic movement. Because US is a safe and commonly used imaging modality, when paired with our bone‐tracking algorithm, US has the potential to assess dynamic knee kinematics across a wide variety of applications in the clinic.Level of EvidenceNot applicable.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3