Difference between forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders in Italy and other European countries: Results of the EU‐VIORMED project

Author:

Castelletti Luca1,Iozzino Laura2ORCID,Zamparini Manuel2,Heitzman Janusz3,Markiewicz Inga3,Nicolò Giuseppe4,Picchioni Marco56,Restuccia Giuseppe7,Rivellini Gianfranco8,Teti Fabio9,Wancata Johannes10,de Girolamo Giovanni2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mental Health and Pathological Dependency AUSL Reggio Emilia REMS Reggio Emilia Italy

2. Psychiatric Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli Brescia Italy

3. Department of Forensic Psychiatry Instytut Psychiatrii I Neurologii Warszawa Poland

4. ASL Roma 5 REMS Roma Italy

5. Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Science Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK

6. St Magnus Hospital Surrey UK

7. AUSL Toscana Nord‐Ovest REMS Volterra Italy

8. Azienda U.L.S.S. 9 Scaligera REMS Nogara Italy

9. ASST, Mantova Sistema Polimodulare REMS Mantova Italy

10. Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry Medical University of Vienna Wien Austria

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThere has been a substantial change in the law on the provision of secure health services for offender‐patients in Italy, a country currently with the lowest general psychiatry bed availability per head of the population in Europe, raising questions about possible differences in offender‐patient admissions between European countries.AimsIn this multicentre case–control study, our aim was to compare the socio‐demographic, clinical and criminological characteristics of a sample of Italian forensic in‐patients with schizophrenia or similar psychosis with patients in a similar diagnostic range in specialist in‐patient services elsewhere in Europe.MethodsSecure hospital unit in‐patients with psychosis were recruited across five European countries (Italy, Austria, Germany, Poland and England). Consenting patients were interviewed by researchers and assessed using a multidimensional standardised process. Within country similarities between Austria, Germany, Poland and England were confirmed.ResultsOverall, 39 Italian participants had had fewer years of education than the 182 patients in the other countries and were less likely to have ever had skilled or professional employment. The Italian patients had been older at first contact with any mental health services than the other Europeans. Diagnosed comorbidity rates were similar, but the Italian group reported higher levels of disability. Although the other European forensic patients were more likely to be undergoing treatment at the time of their index offence, they were also more likely to have been poorly compliant with treatment. The rate of suicide‐related behaviours was significantly lower among the Italian patients than among the others.ConclusionsNotwithstanding similar diagnoses, important differences emerged between patients in Italian forensic mental health resident services and those in four other European countries, some possibly reflecting less access to earlier relevant services in Italy. Others, including lower disability ratings among the Italian patients and a lower rate of suicide‐related behaviours, may indicate that the Italian reforms carry benefits. This is worthy of further evaluation.

Funder

European Commission

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Psychology (miscellaneous),General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference28 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3