Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius‐sparing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy

Abstract

AbstractAimsThis study aimed to investigate the postoperative urinary continence rate and incontinence types compared over time between conventional robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (C‐RARP) and Retzius‐sparing RARP (RS‐RARP).MethodsAll 61 cases were selected from the C‐RARP and RS‐RARP by propensity score matching, and the pad scale, 24‐h pad weight test, and International consultation on incontinence questionnaire‐short form (ICIQ‐SF) were followed‐up over time up to 12 months.ResultsThe probability of urinary continence per pad scale evaluation differed according to how it was defined: the continence rate 12 months after C‐RARP and RS‐RARP were 94% and 95% for 1 pad/day, 85% and 92% for 1 security pad/day, 61% and 85% for no pad use, respectively, which were all significantly better with RS‐RARP. The results of the 24‐h pad weight test were significantly better with RS‐RARP at both 3 and 12 months, with median C‐RARP versus RS‐RARP values of 5 versus 1 g and 2 versus 0 g, respectively. In terms of types of urinary incontinence, the rates of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) increased in both procedures but to a lesser extent in RS‐RARP. Other types of urinary incontinence, such as urge incontinence and terminal dribbling, did not differ significantly before and after surgery and between the two procedures.ConclusionsPostoperative urinary continence was better with RS‐RARP than with C‐RARP per all follow‐up parameters until 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative SUI was significantly lower with RS‐RARP than with C‐RARP, which was considered the main reason for better postoperative urinary continence with RS‐RARP.