Affiliation:
1. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo (CONICET‐FML) Tucumán Argentina
2. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e IML Universidad Nacional de Tucumán Tucumán Argentina
3. Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, UNaM‐CONICET Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS)‐nodo Posadas Posadas Argentina
Abstract
AbstractThe morphological evolution of the appendicular skeleton may reflect the selective pressures specific to different environments, phylogenetic inheritance, or allometry. Covariation in bone shapes enhances morphological integration in response to ecological specializations. In contrast to previous multivariate studies using classical linear morphometry, we use a geometric morphometric approach to explore the morphological diversity of long bones and examine relationships between ecological categories and morphological characters in a species‐rich and ecomorphologically diverse group of rodents. We examined the humerus, ulna, femur, and tibiofibula of 19 sigmodontine species with different locomotor types (ambulatory, quadrupedal‐saltatorial, natatorial, semifossorial and scansorial) to investigate the influence of locomotor type and phylogeny on limb bone shape and morphological integration of the appendicular skeleton. This study represents the most detailed examination of the morphological diversity of long bones in sigmodontines, employing geometric morphometrics within an ecomorphological framework. Our results indicate that functional demands and evolutionary history jointly influence the shape of forelimb and hindlimb bones. The main variation in bone shape is associated with a slenderness‐robustness gradient observed across all ecological categories. Quadrupedal‐saltatorial species, with their need for agility, possess slender and elongated limbs, while natatorial and semifossorial species exhibit shorter and more robust bone shapes, suited for their respective environments. This gradient also influences bone covariation within limbs, demonstrating interconnectedness between elements. We found functional covariation between the ulna‐tibiofibula and humerus‐tibiofibula, likely important for propulsion, and anatomical covariation between the humerus‐ulna and femur‐tibiofibula, potentially reflecting overall limb structure. This study demonstrates that the versatile morphology of long bones in sigmodontines plays a critical role in their remarkable ecological and phylogenetic diversification.
Reference107 articles.
1. A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high‐dimensional multivariate data;Adams D. C.;Systematic Biology,2014
2. Adams D. C. Collyer M. &Kaliontzopoulou A.(2020).Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. R Package Version 3.2.1.https://cran.r-project.org/package=geomorph
3. Ontogenesis and morphological diversification;Alberch P.;American Zoologist,1980
4. Elbow‐joint morphology as a guide to forearm function and foraging behaviour in mammalian carnivores;Andersson K.;Journal of Zoology,2004