Modified NEOMOD score as a neonatal mortality prediction tool in a medium‐income country: A validation diagnostic test study

Author:

Torres‐Canchala Laura12ORCID,Molina Karen2,Barco Mayra2,Soto Laura2,Ballesteros Adriana3,García Alberto F.4

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Research Center Fundación Valle del Lili Cali Colombia

2. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad Icesi Cali Colombia

3. Newborn Unit Fundación Valle del Lili Cali Colombia

4. Department of Surgery Fundación Valle del Lili Cali Colombia

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsMultiple organ dysfunction (MOD) is a potentially reversible physiological disorder that involves two or more systems. Modified NEOMOD (Neonatal Multiple Organ Dysfunction score) scale could be a useful instrument to measure MOD and predict mortality. Our aim was to validate modified NEOMOD in patients from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a middle‐income country.MethodsDiagnostic test study. Preterm newborns admitted NICU were included. Daily values were collected from birthday to Day 14. MOD was defined as at least one point in two or more systems. The lowest score is 0 and the maximum is 16. The outcome variable was mortality. Secondary outcomes were bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), late‐onset neonatal sepsis (LONS), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and length of hospital stay. Area under the curve (AUC) and Hosmer–Lemeshow test were calculated to evaluate scale discrimination and calibration. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between daily modified NEOMOD score and death.ResultsWe included 273 patients who met the inclusion criteria. MOD incidence was 74.4%. The median gestational age in patients with MOD was 30 (interquartile range [IQR]: 27–33) and in patients without MOD it was 32 (IQR: 31–33) (p < 0.001). There were 40 deaths (14.6%), 38 (18.7%) from the MOD group and 2 (2.9%) from non‐MOD group. On accumulated Day 7, AUC was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83–0.95). Modified NEOMOD had good calibration (X2 = 2.94, p = 0.982). DBP (12.8% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.001), ROP (3.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.090), IVH (33% vs. 12.9%, p < 0.001), and LONS (36.5% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001) frequency was higher in the MOD group than non‐MOD group. Length of hospital stay also was higher in MOD group (median 21 days [IQR 7–44] vs. median 5 days [IQR 4–9], p = 0.004).ConclusionModified NEOMOD scale presents good discrimination and calibration for death in preterm children. This scale could help in clinical decision‐making in real‐time.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3