Socioeconomic Influence on Speech Rehabilitation After Total Laryngectomy

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveSpeech rehabilitation following a total laryngectomy significantly impacts the quality of life. Indwelling prosthetic voice restoration provides optimal outcomes; however, the long‐term maintenance of these devices carries considerable financial costs, which are not universally covered by insurance. This investigation aimed to analyze associations between socioeconomic factors and outcomes in postlaryngectomy speech rehabilitation.Study DesignRetrospective cohort analysis.SettingAcademic tertiary‐care center from May 2014 to September 2021.MethodsIn patients undergoing total laryngectomy, the incidence of tracheoesophageal puncture with indwelling vocal prostheses (TEP‐VP) placement within the first postoperative year was compared among household income, demographic factors, and disease characteristics. Functional and maintenance outcomes served as secondary endpoints.ResultsSeventy‐seven patients were included. Forty‐five (58%) underwent indwelling TEP‐VP (41 primaries). Eighty‐nine percent of patients with annual incomes greater than $50k underwent TEP‐VP compared to only 35% with incomes less than $50k/year. TEP‐VP was performed in 85% of patients with commercial insurance, 70% with Medicare, 42% with Medicaid, and 0% with no insurance. On multivariate analysis, annual household incomes greater than $50k were predicted for TEP‐VP placement (odds ratio: 12.7 [2.45‐65.8], p = .002). The utilization of postoperative speech therapy and functional communication outcomes were similar among socioeconomic groups. Twelve patients were unable to afford supplies within the first year, with differences noted among insurance (p = .015) and income status (p = .003).ConclusionDisparities in vocal and speech rehabilitation following laryngectomy may disproportionally affect underserved patients.