Did in‐between rinsing and agitating with distilled water prevents precipitate formation by the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine canal irrigants?

Author:

Maiola Emanuelle Catherine1ORCID,Boppré Letícia Mendes1ORCID,Savaris Julia Menezes1ORCID,Dias Junior Luiz Carlos de Lima1ORCID,Garcia Lucas da Fonseca Roberti1ORCID,Teixeira Cleonice da Silveira1ORCID,Bortoluzzi Eduardo Antunes2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Postgraduate Program in Dentistry Federal University of Santa Catarina Florianopolis Santa Catarina Brazil

2. Department of Diagnosis & Oral Health, Division of Endodontics University of Louisville Louisville Kentucky USA

Abstract

AbstractThe interaction of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) produces an orange‐brown precipitate. The present study evaluated the influence of distilled water (H2O) in different irrigation protocols designed to prevent the formation of precipitate with NaOCl and CHX. Fifty canine teeth were instrumented and split longitudinally. The canal was examined with a stereomicroscope and photographed by canal‐thirds. The tooth halves were repositioned and distributed randomly into five groups, according to the final irrigation protocol (n = 10): G1 (control)—Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) + NaOCl + CHX, conventional irrigation (CI); G2—EDTA + NaOCl + CHX, activated with passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI); G3—EDTA (PUI) + NaOCl (PUI) + H2O (CI) + CHX (PUI); G4—EDTA + NaOCl + H2O + CHX (PUI); G5—EDTA (PUI) + NaOCl (PUI) + H2O (continuous ultrasonic irrigation [CUI]) + CHX (PUI). The specimens were evaluated with a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Energy dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy analysis was performed to identify the elemental profile of the irrigated canal walls. The images were scored according to the extensiveness of precipitate. Data were analyzed (Kruskal–Wallis test, α = 5%). Under the stereomicroscope, G1 had significantly higher scores than all the other groups in all canal‐thirds (p < .05). All four experimental groups showed similar scores (p > .05). There were no significant differences in precipitate formation among root‐thirds in intragroup analysis (p > .05). Upon SEM examination, overall, only G5 had lower scores than G1 (p < .05). Analysis by canal‐thirds showed no significant difference among groups and among canal‐thirds in the intragroup analysis (p > .05). G1 showed high Cl peaks. In‐between irrigation with H2O activated by CUI is effective in preventing precipitate formation during canal debridement with NaOCl and CHX.Research Highlights Continuous ultrasonic irrigation with distilled water was capable to prevent the precipitate formation. The precipitate can be classified as a chemical smear layer.

Funder

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Instrumentation,Histology,Anatomy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3