Affiliation:
1. SUNLAB University of Ottawa 25 Templeton Ottawa K1N 6N5 Canada
2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden Colorado 80401 USA
Abstract
AbstractArtificial ground reflectors improve bifacial energy yield by increasing both front and rear‐incident irradiance. Studies have demonstrated an increase in energy yield due to the addition of artificial reflectors; however, they have not addressed the effect of varying reflector dimensions and placement on system performance and the impact of these parameters on the reflectors' financial viability. We studied the effect of high albedo (70% reflective) artificial reflectors on single‐axis‐tracked bifacial photovoltaic systems through ray‐trace modeling and field measurements. In the field, we tested a range of reflector configurations by varying reflector size and placement and demonstrated that reflectors increased daily energy yield up to 6.2% relative to natural albedo for PERC modules. To confirm the accuracy of our model, we compared modeled and measured power and found a root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.4% on an hourly basis. We modeled a typical meteorological year in Golden, Colorado, to demonstrate the effects of artificial reflectors under a wide range of operating conditions. Seventy percent reflective material can increase total incident irradiance by 1.9%–8.6% and total energy yield by 0.9%–4.5% annually after clipping is considered with a DC–AC ratio of 1.2. Clipping has a significant effect on reflector impact and must be included when assessing reflector viability because it reduces reflector energy gain. We calculated a maximum viable cost for these improvements of up to $2.50–4.60/m2, including both material and installation, in Golden. We expanded our analysis to cover a latitude range of 32–48°N and demonstrated that higher‐latitude installations with lower energy yield and higher diffuse irradiance content can support higher reflector costs. In both modeling and field tests, and for all locations, the ideal placement of the reflectors was found to be directly underneath the module due to the optimized rear irradiance increase.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
U.S. Department of Energy
Reference49 articles.
1. ITPRV.International technology roadmap for photovoltaic. 14th Edition.2023.
2. Bifacial Photovoltaics 2021: Status, Opportunities and Challenges
3. A comprehensive review and outlook of bifacial photovoltaic (bPV) technology
4. Monofacial vs bifacial Si-based PV modules: Which one is more cost-effective?
5. DelineC Ayala PeláezS MarionB SekulicB WoodhouseM SteinJ.Bifacial PV system performance: separating fact from fiction.2019.https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/74090.pdf