Diuretic use and outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Insights from the VICTORIA trial

Abstract

AimsIn VICTORIA, vericiguat compared with placebo reduced the risk of cardiovascular death (CVD) and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) in patients enrolled after a worsening heart failure (WHF) event. We examined clinical outcomes and efficacy of vericiguat as it relates to background use of loop diuretics in patients with WHF.Methods and resultsWe calculated the total daily loop diuretic dose equivalent to furosemide dosing at randomization and categorized these as: no loop diuretic, 1–39, 41–80, 40, and >80 mg total daily dose (TDD). The primary composite outcome of CVD/HFH and its components were evaluated based on TDD loop diuretic and expressed as adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Post‐randomization rates of change in TDD were also examined. Of 4974 patients (98% of the trial) with diuretic dose information available at randomization, 540 (10.8%) were on no loop diuretic, 647 (13.0%) were on 1–39, 1633 (32.8%) were on 40, 1185 (23.8%) were on 41–80, and 969 (19.4%) were on >80 mg TDD. Patients with higher TDD had a higher rate of primary and secondary clinical outcomes. There were no significant interactions with TDD at randomization and efficacy of vericiguat versus placebo for any outcome (all pinteraction > 0.5). Post‐randomization diuretic dose changes for vericiguat and placebo showed similar rates of up‐titration (19.6 and 20.2/100 person‐years), down‐titration (16.8 and 18.1/100 person‐years), and stopping diuretics (22.9 and 24.2/100 person‐years).ConclusionsLoop diuretic TDD at randomization was independently associated with worse outcomes in this high‐risk population. The efficacy of vericiguat was consistent across the range of diuretic doses.