Fluorochrome‐dependent specific changes in spectral profiles using different compensation beads or primary cells in full spectrum cytometry

Abstract

AbstractFull spectrum flow cytometry is a powerful tool for immune monitoring on a single‐cell level and with currently available machines, panels of 40 or more markers per sample are possible. However, with an increased panel size, spectral unmixing issues arise, and appropriate single stain reference controls are required for accurate experimental results and to avoid unmixing errors. In contrast to conventional flow cytometry, full spectrum flow cytometry takes into account even minor differences in spectral signatures and requires the full spectrum of each fluorochrome to be identical in the reference control and the fully stained sample to ensure accurate and reliable results. In general, using the cells of interest is considered optimal, but certain markers may not be expressed at sufficient levels to generate a reliable positive control. In this case, compensation beads show some significant advantages as they bind a consistent amount of antibody independent of its specificity. In this study, we evaluated two types of manufactured compensation beads for use as reference controls for 30 of the most commonly used and commercially available fluorochromes in full spectrum cytometry and compared them to human and murine primary leukocytes. While most fluorochromes show the same spectral profile on beads and cells, we demonstrate that specific fluorochromes show a significantly different spectral profile depending on which type of compensation beads is used, and some fluorochromes should be used on cells exclusively. Here, we provide a list of important considerations when selecting optimal reference controls for full spectrum flow cytometry.