What do we know about autism and policing globally? Preliminary findings from an international effort to examine autism and the criminal justice system

Author:

Cooper Dylan1ORCID,Frisbie Shelby1,Wang Shufang1,Ventimiglia Jonas1,Gibbs Vicki2,Love Abigail M. A.2,Mogavero Melanie3,Benevides Teal W.4,Hyatt Jordan M.5,Hooven Kate6,Basketbill Icylee7,Shea Lindsay1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Aspect Research Centre for Autism Practice Autism Spectrum Australia Chatswood New South Wales Australia

3. Georgian Court University Lakewood Township New Jersey USA

4. Institute of Public and Preventive Health Augusta University Augusta Georgia USA

5. Department of Criminology and Justice Studies Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

6. Autism Services Education Resources and Training (ASERT) Collaborative A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

7. Philadelphia Autism Project, A.J. Drexel Autism Institute Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractResearch has demonstrated that autistic individuals have higher rates of police contact, however, research has seldom explored the fundamental reasons for these interactions and how this might vary across international contexts. To remedy this, the Global Autism and Criminal Justice Consortium created and disseminated the Global Criminal Justice Survey. Descriptive statistics of survey respondents with and without police contact were compared to glean differential characteristics. Frequency and type of recent police interactions (within the last 5 years) among autistic individuals were also examined to better contextualize the reasons that autistic individuals encounter police. Study findings indicated that across a global sample (i.e., North America, Scandinavia, Europe, and Oceania) nearly half of all autistic individuals had an interaction with police and that those with a history of police contact were usually older, had higher educational qualifications, and were more likely to have a co‐occurring mental health or developmental disorder. Among types of interactions, noncriminal encounters, such as welfare checks, traffic incidents, wandering, and behaviors associated with autism, were most common, followed by autistic individuals alleging a crime was committed against them. These findings offer important directions for future research and for targeted policy responses that can address the unique needs of autistic individuals within the justice system.

Funder

International Society for Autism Research

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3