Affiliation:
1. Institute of Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics TU Bergakademie Freiberg Freiberg 09599 Germany
2. Institute of Civil and Structural Engineering Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus‐Senftenberg Cottbus Germany
Abstract
AbstractDuctile materials are used in many applications such as hydrogen storage and transport, energy plants and additively manufactured components. High safety standards are vital for such applications, which underline the necessity of thoroughly investigating ductile failure to ensure safety and increase components efficiency. Ductile failure is mainly prompted by the evolution of the so‐called ductile damage, characterized by the nucleation, growth and coalescence of microvoids due to plastic deformation. Moreover, the plastic zones formed at the crack tip of ductile materials exhibit high sensitivity to the stress triaxiality level, which in turn distinctly depends on the geometry of the considered component. The quantification of the stress triaxiality at the crack tip is therefore essential to better understand and predict ductile crack propagation and failure. For that reason, a non‐local ductile damage model is employed in this work to simulate the ductile crack propagation under different stress triaxiality conditions. Different geometries are considered, such as constrained geometries of notched bending specimens and unconstrained geometries of center cracked tension specimens, which characterize the different triaxiality levels. To address the effects of thickness and initial crack length, three‐dimensional geometries are simulated, which account for the out‐of‐plane crack‐tip constraints. Finally, to evaluate the prediction quality of the simulations, corresponding experiments have been carried out and direct comparisons are conducted, with respect to the crack length, ductile crack propagation and resistance curves.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Reference13 articles.
1. Validation of constraint-based methodology in structural integrity of ferritic steels for nuclear reactor pressure vessels
2. The second parameter in J‐R curves: constraint or triaxiality? Constraint effects in fracture: Theory and applications;Brocks W.;ASTM STP,1995
3. Effect of crack depth and mode of loading on the J‐R curve behavior of a high‐strength steel, constraint effects in fracture;Joyce J. A.;ASTM STP,1993
4. Koçak M. Webster S. Janosch J. J. Ainsworth R. A. &Koers R.(2008).FITNET: Fitness‐for‐service (FFS) procedure. GKSS Research Center.
5. ASTM E1820‐20. (2020).Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. ASTM International.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献