Affiliation:
1. University of Stuttgart Faculty 6: Aerospace Engineering and Geodesy Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics Pfaffenwaldring 21 70569 Stuttgart Germany
Abstract
AbstractFlap deflections of an aircraft wing for active load alleviation within CFD simulations are realized using pure grid deformation due to time saving and low modeling complexity. In this case, spanwise gaps are neglected, which are present in reality during a flap deflection. Another possibility to realize the deflections is the combination of pure grid deformation and Chimera method, which allows the modeling of the gap between flap and wing or consecutive flaps. The overall aim of this work is the analysis of the aerodynamic effects caused by the different modeling approaches realizing leading and trailing edge flap deflections. The comparison of the modeling methods is investigated on the DLR LEISA configuration, which is a generic wing‐fuselage configuration. For active gust load alleviation, the leading edge flaps are deflected downward and the trailing edge flaps are deflected upward. Due to the downward deflection of the leading edge flaps, vortices are formed using the combined Chimera method as a result of the gap consideration. These vortices lead to a local drag increase resulting in a difference between both modeling methods in the spanwise as well as global drag coefficient. With the pure grid deformation these vortices do not occur. Due to the upward trailing edge deflection, the combined Chimera method leads to a pressure compensation via the effective gap enlargement, which is not present in the pure grid deformation. Overall, the combined Chimera method offers a good possibility to model the induced drag as well as the pressure compensation at a large flap deflection.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Reference16 articles.
1. Europäische Kommission und Generaldirektion Mobilität und Verkehr und Generaldirektion Forschung und Innovation Flightpath 2050: Europe's vision for aviation : maintaining global leadership and serving society's needs Publications Office 2011.
2. Schlemmer C. “Modeling and Simulating the Effects of Different Longitudinal Control Surface Configurations on Flexible Aircraft Flight Dynamics ” Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2017 München September 2017.
3. European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) In: Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplane (CS25) Amendment 3 EASA 2007.
4. Xu J. and Kroo I. “Aircraft Design with Active Load Alleviation and Natural Laminar Flow ” Journal of Aircraft Vol. 51 No. 5 2014 pp. 1532–1545.
5. Krüger W. R. Dillinger J. Breuker R. D. Reyes M. and Haydn K. “Adaptive Wing: Investigations of Passive Wing Technologies for Loads Reduction in the CleanSky Smart Fixed Wing Aircraft (SFWA) Project ” Greener Aviation Oktober 2016.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献