Affiliation:
1. Institute of Mechanics, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg Germany
2. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
Abstract
AbstractRotordynamic simulations with nonlinear hydrodynamic bearing forces require a solution of the Reynolds equation at every time step. As a computationally efficient alternative to the standard numerical methods, a semi‐analytical solution based on the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) was developed recently. Through a discretization of the hydrodynamic pressure (dependent variable) along the circumferential but not the axial coordinate, the partial differential equation is transformed into a system of ordinary differential equations. This system of differential equations is referred to as SBFEM equation and can be solved exactly if the influence of shaft tilting is neglected. In common numerical models, this influence can be taken into account without difficulties, but as far as this semi‐analytical approach is concerned, shaft tilting complicates the equations substantially. Therefore, previous studies on the SBFEM solution of the Reynolds equation were conducted without consideration of this effect. The formulation presented in the work at hand no longer requires this simplification. The terms representing the influence of shaft tilting in the SBFEM equation are handled by the perturbation method. The pressure field is expressed by a series expansion, where the solution of order correlates to the power of a perturbation parameter chosen proportional to the tilting angle. The differential equation governing the solution contains lower‐order solutions on its right‐hand side, implying a recursive computation of the series from lowest to highest order. A universal expression for the general solution is formulated, where only the coefficients and the maximum power of the axial coordinate differ for every . This allows the implementation of a general algorithm with no inherent limitation regarding the maximum order of perturbation. For verification, the pressure fields computed by the proposed method are compared to a numerical reference solution, showing that the series converges to the correct result for the investigated set of parameters.
Reference40 articles.
1. Shaft whipping due to oil action in journal bearings;Newkirk B.;General Electric Review,1925
2. Grissom R.(1985).Whirl/whip demonstration. InNASA conference publication 2409: Instability in rotating machinery(pp.415–422) NASA.
3. Whirl and whip—Rotor/bearing stability problems
4. Whirl and whip instabilities in rotor‐bearing system considering a nonlinear force model;De Castro H.;Journal of Sound and Vibration,2008
5. Investigation of Sub-Synchronous Noise & Vibration on Turbocharger Fully Floating Hydrodynamic Bearings – Test & Prediction