Implementing coaching programmes for healthcare professionals—A review of the barriers and facilitators

Author:

Jansen E. J.123,Czabanowska K.3ORCID,de Pagter A. P. J.45ORCID,de Koeijer R. J.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

2. School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Population Science University College Dublin Dublin Ireland

3. Department of International Health Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) FHML Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

4. Department of Quality and Patient Safety Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

5. Department of Quality and Patient Safety Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

6. Institute of Health Policy and Management Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe European Union faces severe and worsening personnel shortages in healthcare. Coaching has emerged as a human‐centred strategy to enhance sustainable employment and retention. While the number of efficacy studies on coaching continues to grow, knowledge about the barriers and facilitators to implementing coaching interventions among healthcare professionals (HCPs) remains scarce.ObjectivesThis systematic review aimed to describe common barriers and facilitators to the implementation of coaching interventions for HCPs.MethodsIn April 2023, five databases were searched for eligible articles. Barriers and facilitators were systematically identified and mapped onto the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Directed content analysis yielded thematic areas and a reporting frequency.ResultsA total of thirty (n = 30) studies were included in this review, representing twenty‐five (n = 25) distinct coaching programmes. Implementation determinants were clustered under two CFIR domains: the Inner Setting (8 facilitators, 5 barriers) and Implementation Process (6 facilitators, 1 barrier). Barriers included (i) limited organisational capacity, (ii) lack of psychological safety, (iii) competing work demands, and (iv) insufficient leadership buy‐in, while facilitators were the (i) allocation of protected time for participants and coaches, (ii) promotion through opinion leaders, (iii) embeddedness in existing Continuous Professional Development programmes, and (iv) programme co‐creation.ConclusionThe findings of this study provide practical insights to guide the future implementation of coaching interventions at an organisational level. In particular, the identified barriers and facilitators suggest, for optimal efficacy and sustainment, coaching interventions must be implemented within a safe, supportive organisational climate.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference83 articles.

1. Workers got fed up. Bosses got scared. This is how the Big Quit happened;Rosenberg J;Mother Jones,2022

2. Evaluation study of the work of the Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in health (EXPH);Directorate‐General for Health and Food Safety;Public Health,2022

3. Prioritizing the Mental Health and Well-Being of Healthcare Workers: An Urgent Global Public Health Priority

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The workforce crisis in healthcare: Moving the debate to bridge evidence and policy;The International Journal of Health Planning and Management;2024-02-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3