Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
2. School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Population Science University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
3. Department of International Health Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) FHML Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
4. Department of Quality and Patient Safety Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
5. Department of Quality and Patient Safety Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
6. Institute of Health Policy and Management Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe European Union faces severe and worsening personnel shortages in healthcare. Coaching has emerged as a human‐centred strategy to enhance sustainable employment and retention. While the number of efficacy studies on coaching continues to grow, knowledge about the barriers and facilitators to implementing coaching interventions among healthcare professionals (HCPs) remains scarce.ObjectivesThis systematic review aimed to describe common barriers and facilitators to the implementation of coaching interventions for HCPs.MethodsIn April 2023, five databases were searched for eligible articles. Barriers and facilitators were systematically identified and mapped onto the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Directed content analysis yielded thematic areas and a reporting frequency.ResultsA total of thirty (n = 30) studies were included in this review, representing twenty‐five (n = 25) distinct coaching programmes. Implementation determinants were clustered under two CFIR domains: the Inner Setting (8 facilitators, 5 barriers) and Implementation Process (6 facilitators, 1 barrier). Barriers included (i) limited organisational capacity, (ii) lack of psychological safety, (iii) competing work demands, and (iv) insufficient leadership buy‐in, while facilitators were the (i) allocation of protected time for participants and coaches, (ii) promotion through opinion leaders, (iii) embeddedness in existing Continuous Professional Development programmes, and (iv) programme co‐creation.ConclusionThe findings of this study provide practical insights to guide the future implementation of coaching interventions at an organisational level. In particular, the identified barriers and facilitators suggest, for optimal efficacy and sustainment, coaching interventions must be implemented within a safe, supportive organisational climate.
Reference83 articles.
1. Workers got fed up. Bosses got scared. This is how the Big Quit happened;Rosenberg J;Mother Jones,2022
2. Evaluation study of the work of the Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in health (EXPH);Directorate‐General for Health and Food Safety;Public Health,2022
3. Prioritizing the Mental Health and Well-Being of Healthcare Workers: An Urgent Global Public Health Priority
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献