Affiliation:
1. Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (JNKVV) Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh India
2. Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University (RPCAU) Pusa Bihar India
3. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi‐Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) Hyderabad Telangana India
4. National Institute of Plant Health Management (NIPHM) Hyderabad Telangana India
5. Centre for Crop Health and School of Agriculture and Environmental Science University of Southern Queensland (UniSQ) Toowoomba Queensland Australia
6. College of Agriculture, Family Sciences and Technology, Agriculture Research Station Fort Valley State University Fort Valley Georgia USA
7. WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation Murdoch University Murdoch Western Australia Australia
Abstract
AbstractRoot‐lesion nematodes (RLN) pose a significant threat to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by damaging the root system and causing up to 25% economic losses due to reduced yield. Worldwide commercially grown chickpea varieties lack significant genetic resistance to RLN, necessitating the identification of genetic variants contributing to natural resistance. This study identifies genomic loci responsible for resistance to the RLN, Pratylenchus thornei Sher & Allen, in chickpea by utilizing high‐quality single nucleotide polymorphisms from whole‐genome sequencing data of 202 chickpea accessions. Phenotypic evaluations of the genetically diverse set of chickpea accessions in India and Australia revealed a wide range of responses from resistant to susceptible. Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) employing Fixed and Random Model Circulating Probability Unification (FarmCPU) and Bayesian‐Information and Linkage‐Disequilibrium Iteratively Nested Keyway (BLINK) models identified 44 marker‐trait associations distributed across all chromosomes except Ca1. Crucially, genomic regions on Ca2 and Ca5 consistently display significant associations across locations. Of 25 candidate genes identified, five genes were putatively involved in RLN resistance response (glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase, heat shock proteins, MYB‐like DNA‐binding protein, zinc finger FYVE protein and pathogenesis‐related thaumatin‐like protein). One notably identified gene (Ca_10016) presents four haplotypes, where haplotypes 1–3 confer moderate susceptibility, and haplotype 4 contributes to high susceptibility to RLN. This information provides potential targets for marker development to enhance breeding for RLN resistance in chickpea. Additionally, five potential resistant genotypes (ICC3512, ICC8855, ICC5337, ICC8950, and ICC6537) to P. thornei were identified based on their performance at a specific location. The study's significance lies in its comprehensive approach, integrating multiple‐location phenotypic evaluations, advanced GWAS models, and functional genomics to unravel the genetic basis of P. thornei resistance. The identified genomic regions, candidate genes, and haplotypes offer valuable insights for breeding strategies, paving the way for developing chickpea varieties resilient to P. thornei attack.
Reference57 articles.
1. Screening of chickpea germplasm against nematode;Ali S. S.;International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter,2000
2. META-R: A software to analyze data from multi-environment plant breeding trials
3. Histopathological studies on cohabitation of Pratylenchus thornei and Rhizoctonia bataticola on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.);Bhatt J.;Advances in Plant Sciences,1997