Seeing is believing: A qualitative study examining how high and ultra‐high‐net‐worth donors utilise evidence to inform their giving and the barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence

Author:

Greenhalgh Caroline1ORCID,Montgomery Paul1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Social Policy University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

Abstract

AbstractWhilst there is growing recognition across the non‐profit literature, that the giving of resources ought to be informed by rigorous evidence, few studies to date have examined how high and ultra‐high‐net‐worth donors use evidence to inform their philanthropy, the type and quality of the evidence they utilise, and how they measure the performance of the charities they support. The primary objective of this study was to examine whether and how philanthropists employ evidence to inform their decision‐making. We employed in‐depth qualitative research methods to elicit the perspectives of philanthropists on how they engaged with evidence and, in so doing, filled a gap in the data. We found barriers to utilising evidence included challenges in accessing evidence, difficulties in assessing the quality and appropriateness of evidence and insufficient resources to capture evidence. Facilitators of evidence use included: making evidence more accessible and enhanced access to professional philanthropy advice and advisors. Despite growing awareness of the importance of evidence, few donors employed sound evidence‐based models of philanthropy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Marketing,Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics

Reference80 articles.

1. Ainsworth D.(2020).Made to measure? How should charities assess effectiveness?https://charityawards.co.uk/article/made-to-measure-how-should-charities-assess-effectiveness/

2. Aleman J. &Roumani N.(2018).Designing for philanthropy impact: The giving compass effective philanthropy learning initiative Issue. S. PACS.https://pacscenter.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/EPLI_Report-PDF_090618-2.pdf

3. Atkinson R. &Flint J.(2001).Accessing hidden and hard‐to‐reach populations: Snowball research strategies. InU. O.Surrey(Ed.) https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.html

4. Bagwell S. Casas D. L. &Van Poortvliet M.(2013).Money for good: Understanding donor motivation and behaviour. file:///Users/carogreenhalgh/Downloads/Money‐for‐good‐understanding‐donor‐motivation‐and‐behaviour.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3