Anatomical and physiological diagnostic discrepancies in fetuses with single‐ventricle congenital heart disease in a contemporary cohort

Author:

Patel T.123ORCID,Kreeger J.2,Sachdeva R.12,Border W.12,Michelfelder E.12

Affiliation:

1. Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA USA

2. Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta GA USA

3. Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus OH USA

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveImage quality of fetal echocardiography (FE) has improved in the recent era, but few recent studies have reported the accuracy of FE, specifically in single ventricle (SV) congenital heart disease (CHD). This study aimed to assess the ability of FE to correctly predict SV‐CHD postnatal anatomy and physiology in a contemporary cohort.MethodsThe contemporary clinical reports of patients with SVCHD, in which FE was performed between July 2017 and July 2021, were compared with postnatal echocardiograms from a formal quality assurance program. SV fetuses were grouped by anatomical subtype. Diagnostic errors were designated as major if the error would have caused significant alteration in parental counseling or postnatal management. The remaining errors were classified as minor. Physiological discrepancies, including prostaglandin‐E (PGE) dependency, atrioventricular valve regurgitation (AVVR), pulmonary venous obstruction and restrictive atrial septum (RAS), were assessed by chart review of the postnatal course.ResultsA total of 119 subjects were analyzed. SV subtypes in the cohort included hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) (n = 68), tricuspid atresia (n = 16), double‐inlet left ventricle (n = 12), unbalanced atrioventricular canal (UAVC) (n = 11), heterotaxy (n = 9) and other (n = 3). The rate of major anatomical and physiological errors was low (n = 6 (5.0%)). A higher proportion of minor errors was noted in HLHS and tricuspid atresia, but the differences were not statistically significant. Physiological discrepancies were uncommon, with three major discrepancies, including underestimation of the degree of venous obstruction in one non‐HLHS fetus with total anomalous pulmonary venous return, overestimation of RAS in one HLHS fetus and incorrect prediction of PGE dependency in one case false‐negative for pulmonary blood flow. No discrepancy in degree of AVVR or RAS affected postnatal care. Minor physiological discrepancies included two false‐positive predictions of PGE dependency with one false‐positive for ductal‐dependent systemic flow and one false‐positive for pulmonary blood flow.ConclusionsIn this contemporary review of FE at our center, there was high accuracy in describing anatomical and physiological findings in SVCHD. Major physiological discrepancies were uncommon but included important cases of false‐negative prediction of PGE dependency and underestimation of obstruction of total anomalous pulmonary venous return. These data can inform more accurate counseling of families with SVCHD fetuses and guide diagnostic improvement efforts. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3