Fetal cardiovascular changes during open and fetoscopic in‐utero spina bifida closure

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveFetoscopic closure of spina bifida using heated and humidified carbon dioxide gas (hhCO2) has been associated with lower maternal morbidity compared with open closure. Fetal cardiovascular changes during these surgical interventions are poorly defined. Our objective was to compare fetal bradycardia (defined as fetal heart rate (FHR) < 110 bpm for 10 min) and changes in umbilical artery (UA) Doppler parameters during open vs fetoscopic closure.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study of 22 open and 46 fetoscopic consecutive in‐utero closures conducted between 2019 and 2023. Both cohorts had similar preoperative counseling and clinical management. FHR and UA Doppler velocimetry were obtained systematically during preoperative assessment, every 5 min during the intraoperative period, and during the postoperative assessment. FHR, UA pulsatility index (PI) and UA end‐diastolic flow (EDF) were segmented into hourly periods during surgery, and the lowest values were averaged for analysis. Umbilical vein maximum velocity was measured in the fetoscopic cohort. At each timepoint at which FHR was recorded, maternal heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured.ResultsFetal bradycardia occurred in 4/22 (18.2%) cases of open closure and 21/46 (45.7%) cases of fetoscopic closure (P = 0.03). FHR decreased gradually in both cohorts after administration of general anesthesia and decreased further during surgery. FHR was significantly lower during hour 2 of surgery in the fetoscopic‐repair cohort compared with the open‐repair cohort. The change in FHR from baseline in the final stage of fetal surgery was significantly more pronounced in the fetoscopic‐repair cohort compared with the open‐repair cohort (mean, −32.4 (95% CI, −35.7 to −29.1) bpm vs −23.5 (95% CI, −28.1 to −18.8) bpm; P = 0.002). Abnormal UA‐EDF (defined as absent or reversed EDF) occurred in 3/22 (13.6%) cases in the open‐repair cohort and 23/46 (50.0%) cases in the fetoscopic‐repair cohort (P = 0.004). There were no differences in UA‐EDF or UA‐PI between closure techniques at the individual stages of assessment.ConclusionsWe observed a decrease in FHR and abnormalities in UA Doppler parameters during both open and fetoscopic spina bifida closure. Fetal bradycardia was more prominent during fetoscopic closure following hhCO2 insufflation, but FHR recovered after cessation of hhCO2. Changes in FHR and UA Doppler parameters during in‐utero spina bifida closure were transient, no cases required emergency delivery and no fetoscopic closure was converted to open closure. These observations should inform algorithms for the perioperative management of fetal bradycardia associated with in‐utero spina bifida closure. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.