Affiliation:
1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
2. Department of Public Health Sciences University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
3. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
4. Division of Hematology and Oncology James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
5. Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer Unit University of Rochester Rochester New York USA
6. Novant Health Cancer Institute/Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
7. Delaware/Christiana Care NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Newark Delaware USA
8. Wisconsin NCORP Marshfield Wisconsin USA
9. Stakeholders for the Care and Research of Oncology Elders (SCOREBoard) Advisory Committee Duarte USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundNutritional impairment is associated with treatment toxicity and worse overall survival in patients with cancer. We aimed to (1) evaluate the association of nutritional impairment with psychological health and quality of life (QOL) and (2) examine which measures of nutrition had the strongest association with psychological health and QOL among older adults receiving cancer treatment with palliative intent.MethodsThis secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from a nationwide cluster randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02107443; PI: Mohile). Adults age ≥70 with advanced cancer and ≥1 geriatric assessment (GA) impairment were enrolled from 2014 to 2017. In line with geriatric oncology standards, we defined nutritional impairment as Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA‐SF) ≤11, body mass index (BMI) <21 kg/m2, or >10% involuntary weight loss in the past 6 months. We conducted multivariable linear regressions to evaluate the association of nutritional impairment with each measure of psychological health and QOL: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS‐15, range 0–15), Generalized Anxiety Disorder‐7 (GAD‐7, range 0–21), NCCN Distress Thermometer (NCCN DT, range 0–10), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐General (FACT‐G, range 0–108). Analyses were adjusted for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and GA.ResultsAmong 541 patients, the mean age was 77 (range 70–96) and 60% had nutritional impairment. Mean baseline scores: GDS‐15 3.1 (SD 2.7), GAD‐7 2.9 (SD 4.0), NCCN DT 2.9 (SD 2.7), and FACT‐G 80 (SD 15). In the adjusted model, compared to those with no nutritional impairment, older adults with nutritional impairment had greater depression (β = 0.79, 95% CI 0.36–1.23) and anxiety severity (β = 0.86, 95% CI 0.19–1.53), and worse QOL (β = −6.31, 95% CI −8.62 to −4.00). Of the measures of nutrition, MNA‐SF ≤11 demonstrated the strongest associations with depression, anxiety, distress, and QOL.ConclusionNutritional impairment is associated with impaired psychological health and worse QOL. Clinicians should use the MNA‐SF to screen older adults for nutritional impairment and offer tailored supportive interventions.
Funder
Walther Cancer Foundation
Conquer Cancer Foundation
National Institute on Aging
National Cancer Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute