Affiliation:
1. Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma USA
2. Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Fisheries Division Lawton Oklahoma USA
3. Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Fisheries Division Caddo Oklahoma USA
4. Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Fisheries Division Oklahoma City Oklahoma USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveSaugeye (Sauger Sander canadensis × Walleye S. vitreus) have been introduced in reservoirs for several purposes, including as a top‐down control to combat stunting in crappie Pomoxis spp. populations. However, no comprehensive diet evaluation has been completed in southern reservoirs. Our objectives were to assess variability in saugeye diet compositions, explore factors influencing crappie presence in saugeye diets, and investigate trends in prey size to inform management strategies regarding predatory control of crappie populations.MethodsWe collected 2638 saugeye diets from six Oklahoma reservoirs. We used permutational multivariate analysis of variance to test differences in diet compositions among saugeye lengths, study reservoirs, and seasons, and we used logistic regression models to correlate the presence of crappie in diets with saugeye size, season, crappie abundance, productivity, and turbidity. Finally, we used bivariate plots of diet indices and quantile regression to explore trends in prey importance and prey size relative to saugeye size.ResultSaugeye diet compositions were best explained by saugeye size, followed by study reservoir and season. Saugeye exhibited an ontogenetic shift from Inland Silverside Menidia beryllina to shad Dorosoma spp., and crappie were eaten infrequently in comparison. The presence of crappie prey in diets was most correlated with saugeye size (primarily large saugeye), followed by higher crappie abundance, lower reservoir productivity, and season (highest in fall). Saugeye consumed larger prey than most piscivores relative to predator size.ConclusionOur results indicated that dominant prey of saugeye transitioned from smaller‐bodied fishes to larger shad as they grew when both prey types were available, which may have implications for growth and recruitment. Ultimately, the low and variable use of crappie prey may lead to inconsistent predatory effects on crappie populations, and large saugeye may exert greater top‐down pressure on crappie in lakes with lower productivity or higher crappie abundance.