Feasibility of a virtual reality course on adult tracheostomy safety skills*

Author:

Abbas J. R.12ORCID,Bertram‐Ralph E.3,Hatton S.4,Garth T.4,Doherty C.5,Bruce I. A.6,McGrath B. A.3

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Biology Medicine and Human Health The University of Manchester Manchester UK

2. Human Factors Academy, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK

3. Acute Intensive Care Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK

4. North West School of Anaesthesia Manchester UK

5. Department of Anaesthesia Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK

6. Department of Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK

Abstract

SummaryThe National Tracheostomy Safety Project has run high‐quality, face‐to‐face skills courses since 2009. The aim of this project was to produce a virtual reality version of the established course and evaluate its impact on participant learning, and participant and faculty satisfaction. Healthcare staff and students were recruited and randomised to attend one of (1) a face‐to‐face traditional course (control); (2) a virtual reality course at a conference centre with on‐site technical support; (3) a fully remote virtual reality course; the virtual reality groups were combined for the analysis of learning outcomes and satisfaction. The primary outcome was the difference in pre/post‐course knowledge scores on a 30‐item questionnaire; secondary outcomes included knowledge retention, usability, comfort/side effects and participant performance in a simulated tracheostomy emergency. Thirty‐seven participants and 15 faculty participated in this study. There was no significant difference between mean pre/post‐course scores from the face‐to‐face (from 21.1 to 23.1; +2) and combined virtual reality (from 17.1 to 21.1; +4) groups, with both showing improvement (p = 0.21). The mean System Usability Scale score for virtual reality was 76.8 (SD 12.6), which is above average; the median Simulator Sickness Questionnaire score was 7.5 (IQR 3.7–22.4), indicating minimal symptoms. All participants resolved the primary clinical problem in the simulated emergency, but the virtual reality (VR) group was slower overall (mean difference 61.8 s, p = 0.003). This technical feasibility study demonstrated that there was no difference in participant knowledge immediately after and 4 weeks following face‐to‐face and virtual reality courses. Virtual reality offers an immersive experience that can be delivered remotely and offers potential benefits of reducing travel and venue costs for attendees, therefore increasing the flexibility of training opportunities.

Funder

UK Research and Innovation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3