Pitfalls in the Cytological Diagnosis of Nodal Hodgkin Lymphoma

Author:

Handa Uma1ORCID,Mohamedali Rasheeda1ORCID,Punia Rajpal Singh1,Singh Simrandeep2,Bhagat Ranjeev1,Aggarwal Phiza1ORCID,Kaur Manveen1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Deptarment of Pathology GMCH‐32 Chandigarh India

2. Department of Surgery GMCH‐32 Chandigarh India

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundHodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by malignant Reed–Sternberg (RS) cells in an inflammatory background. Although the cytological features of HL are well elucidated in literature, yet many postulated factors cause its misdiagnosis. This study aims to assess the diagnostic reliability of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in HL and evaluate the factors contributing to a false‐negative and false‐positive diagnosis, taking histopathology as the gold standard.MethodsThis was a retrospective study in which 47 cases of HL diagnosed on histopathology were compared with their prior cytological diagnosis.ResultsThe patient's age ranged from 3 to 80 years (median: 36 years) with a M:F ratio of 2.9:1. Lymph node aspirations were performed from multiple anatomical sites, out of which the cervical was the most common (57.8%). FNAC was inconclusive in two cases due to unsatisfactory smears. The false‐negative diagnosis of reactive lymphadenitis was given in four cases, and false‐positive in four cases, which included three cases of non‐HL, and one case of malignant small round blue cell tumor. The overall diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in the diagnosis of HL was 82.2%.ConclusionsThe cytological diagnosis of HL can be challenging when classic RS cells are absent. Contributing factors for a false‐negative diagnosis include obscuring reactive inflammatory cells, fibrosis of the involved lymph nodes, partial involvement of the lymph node, and misinterpretation. A thorough clinical examination with evaluation of FNAC smears from multiple areas, and ancillary tests help improve the diagnostic accuracy of cytological diagnosis.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3