Cross‐national comparisons of later‐life cognitive function using data from the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP): Considerations and recommended best practices

Author:

Kobayashi Lindsay C.12ORCID,Jones Richard N.3,Briceño Emily M.4,Rentería Miguel Arce5,Zhang Yuan67,Meijer Erik8,Langa Kenneth M.2910,Lee Jinkook811,Gross Alden L.1213

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health University of Michigan School of Public Health Ann Arbor Michigan USA

2. Survey Research Center University of Michigan Institute for Social Research Ann Arbor Michigan USA

3. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior Warren Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA

4. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

5. Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain Department of Neurology Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons New York City New York USA

6. Department of Sociomedical Sciences Columbia University New York City New York USA

7. Robert N. Butler Columbia Aging Center Columbia University New York City New York USA

8. Center for Economic and Social Research University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

9. Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

10. Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research Ann Arbor Michigan USA

11. Department of Economics University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

12. Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA

13. Center on Aging and Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractThe Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) is a major innovation that provides, for the first time, harmonized data for cross‐national comparisons of later‐life cognitive functions that are sensitive to linguistic, cultural, and educational differences across countries. However, cognitive function does not lend itself to direct comparison across diverse populations without careful consideration of the best practices for such comparisons. This perspective discusses theoretical and methodological considerations and offers a set of recommended best practices for conducting cross‐national comparisons of risk factor associations using HCAP data. Because existing and planned HCAP studies provide cognition data representing an estimated 75% of the global population ≥65 years of age, these recommended best practices will support high‐quality comparative analyses of cognitive aging around the world. The principles described in this perspective are applicable to any researcher aiming to integrate or compare harmonized data on cognitive outcomes and their risk and protective factors across diverse populations.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Neurology (clinical),Developmental Neuroscience,Health Policy,Epidemiology

Reference40 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3