Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil Architectural, and Environmental Engineering The University of Texas at Austin 301 E. Dean Keeton Street Stop C1700 Austin TX 78712 USA
2. Department of Chemistry The University of Texas at Austin 105 E. 24th Street Stop A5300 Austin TX 78712 USA
3. Advanced Institute for Materials Research (WPI‐AIMR) Tohoku University Sendai 980–8577 Japan
Abstract
AbstractHerein, aqueous nitrate (NO3−) reduction is used to explore composition‐selectivity relationships of randomly alloyed ruthenium‐palladium nanoparticle catalysts to provide insights into the factors affecting selectivity during this and other industrially relevant catalytic reactions. NO3− reduction proceeds through nitrite (NO2−) and then nitric oxide (NO), before diverging to form either dinitrogen (N2) or ammonium (NH4+) as final products, with N2 preferred in potable water treatment but NH4+ preferred for nitrogen recovery. It is shown that the NO3− and NO starting feedstocks favor NH4+ formation using Ru‐rich catalysts, while Pd‐rich catalysts favor N2 formation. Conversely, a NO2− starting feedstock favors NH4+ at ≈50 atomic‐% Ru and selectivity decreases with higher Ru content. Mechanistic differences have been probed using density functional theory (DFT). Results show that, for NO3− and NO feedstocks, the thermodynamics of the competing pathways for N–H and N–N formation lead to preferential NH4+ or N2 production, respectively, while Ru‐rich surfaces are susceptible to poisoning by NO2− feedstock, which displaces H atoms. This leads to a decrease in overall reduction activity and an increase in selectivity toward N2 production. Together, these results demonstrate the importance of tailoring both the reaction pathway thermodynamics and initial reactant binding energies to control overall reaction selectivity.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Welch Foundation
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献