National trends in emergency conditions through the Omicron COVID‐19 wave in commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees

Author:

Stevens Maria A.1234,Melnick Edward R.56,Savitz Samuel T.12,Jeffery Molly Moore127,Nath Bidisha5,Janke Alexander T.58ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

2. Division of Health Care Delivery Research Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

3. Department of Health Policy and Management University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

4. OptumLabs Eden Prairie Minnesota USA

5. Department of Emergency Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

6. Department of Biostatistics (Health Informatics) Yale School of Public Health New Haven USA

7. Department of Emergency Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester USA

8. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation University of Michigan/VA Ann Arbor Ann Arbor Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate trends in emergency care sensitive conditions (ECSCs) from pre‐COVID (March 2018–February 2020) through Omicron (December 2021–February 2022).MethodsThis cross‐sectional analysis evaluated trends in ECSCs using claims (OptumLabs Data Warehouse) from commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees. Emergency department (ED) visits for ECSCs (acute appendicitis, aortic aneurysm/dissection, cardiac arrest/severe arrhythmia, cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, opioid overdose, pre‐eclampsia) were reported per 100,000 person months from March 2018 to February 2022 by pandemic wave. We calculated the percent change for each pandemic wave compared to the pre‐pandemic period.ResultsThere were 10,268,554 ED visits (March 2018−February 2022). The greatest increases in ECSCs were seen for pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest/severe arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, and pre‐eclampsia. For commercial enrollees, pulmonary embolism visit rates increased 22.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.6%–26.9%) during Waves 2−3, 37.2% (95% CI, 29.1%–45.8%] during Delta, and 27.9% (95% CI, 20.3%–36.1%) during Omicron, relative to pre‐pandemic rates. Cardiac arrest/severe arrhythmia visit rates increased 4.0% (95% CI, 0.2%–8.0%) during Waves 2−3; myocardial infarction rates increased 4.9% (95% CI, 2.1%–7.8%) during Waves 2−3. Similar patterns were seen in Medicare Advantage enrollees. Pre‐eclampsia visit rates among reproductive‐age female enrollees increased 31.1% (95% CI, 20.9%–42.2%), 23.7% (95% CI, 7.5%,–42.3%), and 34.7% (95% CI, 16.8%–55.2%) during Waves 2−3, Delta, and Omicron, respectively. ED visits for other ECSCs declined or exhibited smaller increases.ConclusionsED visit rates for acute cardiovascular conditions, pulmonary embolism and pre‐eclampsia increased despite declines or stable rates for all‐cause ED visits and ED visits for other conditions. Given the changing landscape of ECSCs, studies should identify drivers for these changes and interventions to mitigate them.

Funder

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3