Older adults’ goals of care in the emergency department setting: A qualitative study guided by the 4Ms framework

Author:

Sheber Melissa1,McKnight Mackenzie1,Liebzeit Daniel2,Seaman Aaron3,Husser Erica K.4,Buck Harleah2,Reisinger Heather S.3,Lee Sangil5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA

2. University of Iowa College of Nursing Iowa City Iowa USA

3. Department of Internal Medicine University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA

4. Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing Pennsylvania State University, University Park Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Department of Epidemiology University of Iowa College of Public Health Iowa City Iowa USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWe sought to identify what matters to older adults (60 years and older) presenting to the emergency department (ED) and the challenges or concerns they identify related to medication, mobility, and mentation to inform how the 4Ms framework could improve care of older adults in the ED setting.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted using the 4Ms to identify what matters to older adults (≥60 years old) presenting to the ED and what challenges or concerns they identify related to medication, mobility, and mentation. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with a convenience sample of patients in a single ED. Interview guide responses and interviewer field notes were entered into REDCap. Interviews were reviewed by the research team (2 coders per interview) who inductively assigned codes. A codebook was created through an iterative process and was used to group codes into themes and sub‐themes within the 4Ms framework.ResultsA total of 20 ED patients participated in the interviews lasting 30–60 minutes. Codes identified for “what matters” included problem‐oriented expectation, coordination and continuity, staying engaged, being with family, and getting back home. Codes related to the other 4Ms (medication, mobility, and mentation) described challenges. Medication challenges included: non‐adherence, side effects, polypharmacy, and knowledge. Mobility challenges included physical activity and independence. Last, mentation challenges included memory concerns, depressed mood, and stress and worry.ConclusionsOur study used the 4Ms to identify “what matters” to older adults presenting to the ED and the challenges they face regarding medication, mobility, and mentation. Understanding what matters to patients and the specific challenges they face can help shape and individualize a patient‐centered approach to care to facilitate the goals of care discussion and handoff to the next care team.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3