Changes in low‐acuity patient volume in an emergency department after launching a walk‐in clinic

Author:

Kurian Divya1,Sundaram Vandana2,Naidich Anna Graber2,Shah Shreya A.3,Ramberger Daniel4,Khan Saud4,Ravi Shashank1,Patel Sunny5,Ribeira Ryan1,Brown Ian1,Wagner Alexei6,Gharahbhagian Laleh1,Miller Kate2,Shen Sam1,Yiadom Maame Yaa A. B.135ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA

2. Quantitative Sciences Unit Stanford University Palo Alto California USA

3. Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA

4. Stanford Health Care Palo Alto California USA

5. Department of Emergency Medicine New York‐Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA

6. Department of Emergency Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveUnscheduled low‐acuity care options are on the rise and are often expected to reduce emergency department (ED) visits. We opened an ED‐staffed walk‐in clinic (WIC) as an alternative care location for low‐acuity patients at a time when ED visits exceeded facility capacity and the impending flu season was anticipated to increase visits further, and we assessed whether low‐acuity ED patient visits decreased after opening the WIC.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we compared patient and clinical visit characteristics of the ED and WIC patients and conducted interrupted time‐series analyses to quantify the impact of the WIC on low‐acuity ED patient visit volume and the trend.ResultsThere were 27,211 low‐acuity ED visits (22.7% of total ED visits), and 7,058 patients seen in the WIC from February 26, 2018, to November 17, 2019. Low‐acuity patient visits in the ED reduced significantly immediately after the WIC opened (P = 0.01). In the subsequent months, however, patient volume trended back to pre‐WIC volumes such that there was no significant impact at 6, 9, or 12 months (P = 0.07). Had WIC patients been seen in the main ED, low‐acuity volume would have been 27% of the total volume rather than the 22.7% that was observed.ConclusionThe WIC did not result in a sustained reduction in low‐acuity patients in the main ED. However, it enabled emergency staff to see low‐acuity patients in a lower resource setting during times when ED capacity was limited.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3