Technical note: Exploring the detectability of coronary calcification using ultra‐high‐resolution photon‐counting‐detector CT

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCoronary calcification is a strong indicator of coronary artery disease, and patients with a “zero” coronary calcification score have a much lower risk of future cardiac events than those with even small amounts of calcium. However, false‐negative (incorrect zero scores) may occur if small calcifications are missed at CT due to limited spatial resolution.PurposeTo demonstrate lower limits of detection for coronary calcification using an ultra‐high‐resolution (UHR) mode on a clinical photon‐counting‐detector CT (PCD‐CT), compared to a conventional energy‐integrating‐detector CT (EID‐CT).MethodsChicken eggshell fragments (0.4–0.8 mm) mimicking coronary calcifications were scanned on a clinical PCD‐CT (NAEOTOM Alpha) in UHR mode and a conventional EID‐CT (SOMATOM Force) with matched tube potential and radiation dose levels to the PCD‐CT. PCD‐CT images were reconstructed with a sharp kernel (Qr68) and a quantum iterative algorithm (QIR‐3). Two sets of EID‐CT images were reconstructed: routine clinical kernel (Qr36, ADMIRE‐3) and a sharper kernel (Qr54) with similar noise to PCD‐CT images. With institutional review board approval, in vivo exams performed with the PCD‐CT in UHR mode were compared against patients’ clinical EID‐CT exams. The visibility of calcifications on PCD‐CT and EID‐CT images was assessed and compared qualitatively.ResultsPCD‐CT images visualized all calcified fragments, while EID‐CT failed to detect those below 0.6 mm using a routine protocol. EID‐CT with Qr54 improved visibility but distorted boundaries. Calcifications were less visible on EID‐CT than PCD‐CT as phantom sizes increased. 0.6‐ and 0.7‐mm calcified fragments were barely visible on 35‐ and 40‐cm phantom EID‐CT images. Patient cases showed small calcifications missed on EID‐CT but detected on PCD‐CT.ConclusionAt matched radiation dose, PCD‐CT in UHR mode provided higher spatial resolution and improved the detectability of small calcified fragments for different phantom/patient sizes in comparison to EID‐CT.