Correlation between theoretical knowledge and the difference between self‐ and teaching doctor‐assessment

Author:

Goob Janosch1,Erdelt Kurt1,Nold Ephraim1,Liebermann Anja2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany

2. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne Cologne Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe right intuition for self‐assessment without overestimating or underestimating oneself compared to theoretical knowledge is a skill that requires conscious practice and is very often paradoxically opposed to the level of knowledge. Self‐assessment is an essential skill for dental professionals for lifelong learning and improvement. The objective of our study was to assess the correlation between theoretical knowledge and the difference between self‐ and teaching doctor‐assessment.MethodsThe app “digital course organizer” for organization and assessment was used for the self‐ and teaching doctor‐assessment of students for each day of patient treatment during the clinical courses at a university hospital. The difference between the self‐ and teaching doctor‐assessment was compared to the score of an initial theoretical written test at the beginning of the eighth semester to assess the correlation between overestimation or underestimation and theoretical knowledge.ResultsA total of 309 dental students over four semesters in the clinical study phase (fourth and fifth years; eighth and 10th semesters) participated in the investigation. The overall view of all values showed very low correlations (<0.2) of the assessment difference values of both practical courses for the initial written test.ConclusionThere were very low correlations between the initial written test (theoretical knowledge) and the difference between self‐ and teaching doctor‐assessment as well as no evidence of overestimation and underestimation.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3