Impact of access to treatment on patient‐reported outcomes among rheumatoid arthritis patients with tDMARDs and bDMARDS in two Latin‐American countries: A prospective observational study

Author:

Reyes Juan M.1ORCID,Gutierrez‐Ardila Magda V.2ORCID,Madariaga Hugo3,Otero William4,Guzman Renato5,Izquierdo Jorge6,Del Castillo David J.6,Abello Mauricio7,Velez Patricia8,Ponce de Leon Dario9ORCID,Lukic Tatjana10,Amador Luisa F.1,Castaño Natalia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pfizer Bogota Colombia

2. Pfizer Santiago Chile

3. Centro Médico CEEN Arequipa Peru

4. Centro Servimed Bucaramanga Colombia

5. Centro IDEARG Bogotá Colombia

6. Clínica del Occidente Cali Colombia

7. Centro Integral de Reumatología Circaribe Barranquilla Colombia

8. Centro Médico CIREEM Bogota Colombia

9. Pfizer Lima Peru

10. Pfizer Inc New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsA noninterventional prospective study was performed in Colombia and Peru. The aim was to describe the impact of access to treatment on Patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after failure to conventional disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in real‐life conditions.MethodsThe impact of access to treatment was measured by access barriers, time to supply (TtS) and interruption evaluating their effect in changes of PROs between baseline and 6‐month follow‐up between February 2017 and November 2019. The association of access to care with disease activity, functional status, health‐related quality of life was assessed using bivariate and multivariable analysis. Results are expressed in least mean difference; TtS in mean number of days for delivery of treatment at baseline. Variability measures were standard deviation and standard error.ResultsOne hundred seventy patients were recruited, 70 treated with tofacitinib and 100 with biological DMARDs. Thirty‐nine patients reported access barriers. The mean of TtS was 23 ± 38.83 days. The difference from baseline to 6‐month visit in PROs were affected by access barriers and interruptions. There was not statistically significant difference in the of PRO's score among visits in patients that reported delay of supply of more than 23 days compared to patients with less days of delay.ConclusionThis study suggested the access to treatment can affect the response to the treatment at 6 months of follow‐up. There seems to be no effect in the PROs for delay of TtS during the studied period.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3