Affiliation:
1. Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Science Lab, Department of Biology Northern Michigan University Marquette Michigan 49855 USA
2. Department of Applied Ecology North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27607 USA
3. Integrative Ecology Lab, Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga Tennessee 37403 USA
Abstract
AbstractInstitutions of higher education (IHE) throughout the United States have a long history of acting out various levels of commitment to diversity advancement, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Despite decades of DEI “efforts,” the academy is fraught with legacies of racism that uphold white supremacy and prevent marginalized populations from full participation. Furthermore, politicians have not only weaponized education but passed legislation to actively ban DEI programs and censor general education curricula (https://tinyurl.com/antiDEI). Ironically, systems of oppression are particularly apparent in the fields of Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology (EECB), which recognize biological diversity as essential for ecological integrity and resilience. Yet, among EECB faculty, people who do not identify as cis‐heterosexual, nondisabled, affluent white males are poorly represented. Furthermore, IHE lacks metrics to quantify DEI as a priority. Here we show that only 30.3% of United States faculty positions advertised in EECB from Jan 2019 to May 2020 required a diversity statement; diversity statement requirements did not correspond with state‐level diversity metrics. Though many announcements “encourage women and minorities to apply,” empirical evidence demonstrates that hiring committees at most institutions did not prioritize an applicant's DEI advancement potential. We suggest a model for change and call on administrators and faculty to implement SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Timely) strategies for DEI advancement across IHE throughout the United States. We anticipate our quantification of diversity statement requirements relative to other application materials will motivate institutional change in both policy and practice when evaluating a candidate's potential “fit.” IHE must embrace a leadership role to not only shift the academic culture to one that upholds DEI but to educate and include people who represent the full diversity of our society. In the current context of political censure of education including book banning and backlash aimed at Critical Race Theory, which further reinforce systemic white supremacy, academic integrity and justice are more critical than ever.
Subject
Pharmaceutical Science,General Medicine
Reference19 articles.
1. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration
2. Inclusive conservation requires amplifying experiences of diverse scientists
3. Chaudhary B. andA. A.Berhe.2020.Ten simple rules for building an anti‐racist lab.https://ecoevorxiv.org/4a9p8/?fbclid=IwAR1aVIM3I3Ieyyb4VYSVXyCdjAcFNP0iy8dxu1HjAU9s66yrt8VAJCQH_PQ
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献